This paper argues that misconduct affects a wider group than editors, although it is editors who are currently taking the lead in the promotion of standards. The authors suggest that responsibility for maintaining and improving standards in research publication should not be left to editors but should be seen as something in which all researchers have a stake. They support moves to make editors themselves more accountable to their readers and authors
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars’ self-reported publication...
This article offers perspectives from academics with recent journal editing experience on a range of...
As the competitive pressures on academic researchers escalate, so the temptation grows to ‘cut corne...
This paper argues that misconduct affects a wider group than editors, although it is editors who are...
Abstract: Scientific journals have a central place in protecting research integrity because publishe...
Abstract There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist ar...
In traditional publishing, authors are usually held accountable by editors. Rarely, however, are edi...
Increasing complexity and multidisciplinarity make collaboration essential for modern science. This,...
There is growing awareness that issues that fall under the so-called editorial prerogative and hence...
This paper concerns the responsibility of co-authors in cases of scientific misconduct. Arguments in...
In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to...
Complaints made to editors about an author’s unethical behaviour relating to work submitted for publ...
This extended editorial asks whether peer-review is continuing to operate effectively in policing re...
Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research ...
Publication is considered the end point of the research project. New scientific results may be asses...
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars’ self-reported publication...
This article offers perspectives from academics with recent journal editing experience on a range of...
As the competitive pressures on academic researchers escalate, so the temptation grows to ‘cut corne...
This paper argues that misconduct affects a wider group than editors, although it is editors who are...
Abstract: Scientific journals have a central place in protecting research integrity because publishe...
Abstract There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist ar...
In traditional publishing, authors are usually held accountable by editors. Rarely, however, are edi...
Increasing complexity and multidisciplinarity make collaboration essential for modern science. This,...
There is growing awareness that issues that fall under the so-called editorial prerogative and hence...
This paper concerns the responsibility of co-authors in cases of scientific misconduct. Arguments in...
In the academic world, despite their corrective nature, there is still a negative stigma attached to...
Complaints made to editors about an author’s unethical behaviour relating to work submitted for publ...
This extended editorial asks whether peer-review is continuing to operate effectively in policing re...
Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research ...
Publication is considered the end point of the research project. New scientific results may be asses...
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars’ self-reported publication...
This article offers perspectives from academics with recent journal editing experience on a range of...
As the competitive pressures on academic researchers escalate, so the temptation grows to ‘cut corne...