Varför används inte FRP mer i Sverige? : Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) är ett material som bland annat används som förstärkning i betong

The Construction sector is one of the biggest contributors to climate change. During 2020 the sector was responsible for 20% out of Sweden's total emitted greenhouse gases. The choice of construction materials is one of the key factors that decides a building’s or facility’s carbon footprint. The purpose of this paper is to research if Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) can be a viable option to conventional steel reinforcement. The aim of this work is to find an answer to the following question “What is it that prevents us in Sweden from using FRP reinforcement in concrete?”. We have carried out calculations on a simple reinforced Concrete Beam and a reinforced concrete wall with different rebars (steel and FRP) according to Eurocode to assess the reliability of using FRP in concrete. The part of the study where carbon footprint is analyzed derives from two Environmental Product Declarations (EPD). The product Combar is one type of fiber reinforced polymer and represents FRP in this study. The steel reinforcement is represented by K500C-T. Results indicate that Combar can be a good alternative to steel with the right circumstances. The lack of standard and high carbon footprint are the two main factors which limits the use of FRP at the moment.During 2023 the goal for the European Commission for standardization is to release updated standards that include a calculation process for FRP. With the upcoming release of the new standard, our thesis is that FRP will get a wider range of use in Sweden. This is because a new standard will help the industry to be more aware of the benefits of using FR