In recent debates about the replication crisis, two positions have been dominant: One that focuses on methodological reforms and one that focuses on theory-building. This paper takes up the suggestion that there might be a deeper difference in play, concerning the ways the very subject matter of psychology is construed by opposing camps, i.e., in terms of stable effects vs in terms of complexity. I argue that both gets something right, but neither is sufficient. My analysis suggests that the contextsensitivity of the psychological subject matter needs to be front and center of methodological and theoretical efforts. Powere
At least since Meehl’s (in)famous 1978 article, the state of theorizing in psychology has often been...
This article outlines what we call the “narrative of psychology exceptionalism” in commentaries on t...
The replication or reproducibility crisis in psychological science has renewed attention to philosop...
There has been increasing criticism of the way psychologists conduct and analyze studies. These crit...
Although psychology’s recent crisis has been attributed to various scientific practices, it has come...
Current debates about the replication crisis in psychology take it for granted that direct replica...
A worrying number of psychological findings are not replicable. Diagnoses of the causes of this "rep...
Discussions of the replication crisis in psychology require more substantive analysis of the crisis ...
Throughout its history, psychology has been faced with fundamental crises that all revolve around it...
Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years...
The “replication crisis” may well be the single most important challenge facing empirical psychologi...
At least since Meehl’s (in)famous 1978 article, the state of theorizing in psychology has often been...
This article outlines what we call the “narrative of psychology exceptionalism” in commentaries on t...
The replication or reproducibility crisis in psychological science has renewed attention to philosop...
There has been increasing criticism of the way psychologists conduct and analyze studies. These crit...
Although psychology’s recent crisis has been attributed to various scientific practices, it has come...
Current debates about the replication crisis in psychology take it for granted that direct replica...
A worrying number of psychological findings are not replicable. Diagnoses of the causes of this "rep...
Discussions of the replication crisis in psychology require more substantive analysis of the crisis ...
Throughout its history, psychology has been faced with fundamental crises that all revolve around it...
Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years...
The “replication crisis” may well be the single most important challenge facing empirical psychologi...
At least since Meehl’s (in)famous 1978 article, the state of theorizing in psychology has often been...
This article outlines what we call the “narrative of psychology exceptionalism” in commentaries on t...
The replication or reproducibility crisis in psychological science has renewed attention to philosop...