The Ninth Circuit certified the following question to the Court: Under Nevada law, must a series LLC created pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. Section 86.296 be sued in its own name for a court to obtain jurisdiction over it, or may the master LLC under which the series is created be sued instead? In 2005, the legislature amended NRS 86.296 to allow for the creation of Series LLCs. NRS 86.2962(2) “provides a list of optional, but not mandatory, attributes for a Series LLC.” The statutory language of NRS 86.292(2) further provides that series LLCs “may” sue or be sued in their own names. However, this Court finds that “the plain language of NRS 86.296(2) does not allow a party to sue a master LLC in lieu of a series LLC,” and answers the certified...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court held that when the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is acting as a conservator, absen...
The Court held that (1) under Nevada\u27s HOA foreclosure redemption statute NRS 116.31166(3) a home...
The Series LLC is a new and idiosyncratic business entity that presents unique questions of law in t...
The Court determined that prior to its 2015 amendment, NRS § 116.31168, through its incorporation of...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
Under NRS 86.371 and NRS 86.381, an LLC member is not responsible for the LLC’s liabilities solely b...
The Court held that under NRCP 41(e) a complaint in intervention is a part of an original action, an...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
In response to a certified question by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada...
Entity choice law is constantly evolving and innovating. The series LLC form is one such example. Al...
Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 116 codifies the Uniform Common-Interest Ownership Act and out...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...
The Court held that when the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is acting as a conservator, absen...
The Court held that (1) under Nevada\u27s HOA foreclosure redemption statute NRS 116.31166(3) a home...
The Series LLC is a new and idiosyncratic business entity that presents unique questions of law in t...
The Court determined that prior to its 2015 amendment, NRS § 116.31168, through its incorporation of...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
Under NRS 86.371 and NRS 86.381, an LLC member is not responsible for the LLC’s liabilities solely b...
The Court held that under NRCP 41(e) a complaint in intervention is a part of an original action, an...
The Court held that a servicer of a loan that is owned by a regulated entity does have standing to r...
In response to a certified question by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada...
Entity choice law is constantly evolving and innovating. The series LLC form is one such example. Al...
Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 116 codifies the Uniform Common-Interest Ownership Act and out...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that attorneys do not qualify as agents for the purposes of retaliatory action ...