Add to ORKGThe Court of Appeals for the State of Nevada found that the district court properly used its discretion to find probable cause for the search warrants and to keep them sealed. The district court erred when it denied the appellants’ request to return its property because the appellants were not able to properly demonstrate privilege
Plaintiff demanded a writ of prohibition against the defendant, a justice of the peace, to prevent h...
Jose Simon Gameros-Perez and Isidro Benitez-Medina, Respondents, were believed to be in possession o...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Hardesty, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the search of...
This discusses whether Nevada justice courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to suppress illega...
While the fourth amendment does not make a warrant mandatory for all searches, it does require that ...
District courts must apply the catalyst theory to determine whether a party prevails in litigation r...
The court found that the lower court had erroneously applied the incorrect statute in determining th...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
The Court determined that (1) the district court did not err in denying appellant Republican Attorne...
The right of citizens to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons is pr...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
The Court determined, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
NRS 62C.240 is triggered when circumstances surrounding a juvenile’s arrest plainly demonstrate that...
Plaintiff demanded a writ of prohibition against the defendant, a justice of the peace, to prevent h...
Jose Simon Gameros-Perez and Isidro Benitez-Medina, Respondents, were believed to be in possession o...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Hardesty, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the search of...
This discusses whether Nevada justice courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to suppress illega...
While the fourth amendment does not make a warrant mandatory for all searches, it does require that ...
District courts must apply the catalyst theory to determine whether a party prevails in litigation r...
The court found that the lower court had erroneously applied the incorrect statute in determining th...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
The Court determined that (1) the district court did not err in denying appellant Republican Attorne...
The right of citizens to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons is pr...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
The Court determined, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ...
NRS 62C.240 is triggered when circumstances surrounding a juvenile’s arrest plainly demonstrate that...
Plaintiff demanded a writ of prohibition against the defendant, a justice of the peace, to prevent h...
Jose Simon Gameros-Perez and Isidro Benitez-Medina, Respondents, were believed to be in possession o...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...