Performance evaluation of the different prediction models on all piezometers (D: The maximum difference in absolute value between the observed cumulative proportions and the simulated cumulative proportions; Dα: The critical value).</p
<p>Comparison of the treating performance among different model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>In the two sub-figures, the parameter ; <i>η</i> is assigned to values from 1 to 1000; is assign...
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
<p>Comparison prediction accuracy of model with <i>p</i> = 1000 and <i>p</i> = 200.</p
Performance assessment of prediction model based on different criteria; (a) comparison of statistica...
<p>Comparison of the pattern between models using various summary values. These were generated from ...
Overall performance and calibration of the prediction models (quantitative approach).</p
a<p>Performance of the Inferelator-based model in steady-state prediction.</p>b<p>Performance of the...
<div><p>As a performance measure for a prediction model, the area under the receiver operating chara...
<p>Comparison of the treating performance among different model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>In the two sub-figures, the parameter ; <i>η</i> is assigned to values from 1 to 1000; is assign...
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Evaluation of the performances of the different prediction models on all the pendulums.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
Comparison between the real data and the simulated data of the piezometer I1.</p
<p>Comparison prediction accuracy of model with <i>p</i> = 1000 and <i>p</i> = 200.</p
Performance assessment of prediction model based on different criteria; (a) comparison of statistica...
<p>Comparison of the pattern between models using various summary values. These were generated from ...
Overall performance and calibration of the prediction models (quantitative approach).</p
a<p>Performance of the Inferelator-based model in steady-state prediction.</p>b<p>Performance of the...
<div><p>As a performance measure for a prediction model, the area under the receiver operating chara...
<p>Comparison of the treating performance among different model test solutions (pH = 7.05±0.25).</p
<p>In the two sub-figures, the parameter ; <i>η</i> is assigned to values from 1 to 1000; is assign...
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p