Child welfare agencies increasingly utilize family team decision-making conferences in cases where there is a pending child protection matter in family court. The simultaneous proceedings present critical questions for all practitioners and judges about the relationship between the court and the agency, and implications for the rights of parents and children. This article discusses the critical tensions raised when the agency pursues extra-judicial conferences in the absence of coordination with and recognition of the court process, including expectations of confidentiality, the role of attorneys in conferences and the perception of fairness in both forums
Much anecdotal information exists about problems in courts adjudicating child welfare (CW) cases. Ho...
A recurring problem which courts face is the need to resolve the conflict which arises when foster p...
From 2009 to 2016 the University of Michigan Law School served as the National Quality Improvement C...
The problems associated with long-term foster care of children have escalated over the past decade a...
The judicial role in child custody and visitation disputes has traditionally been understood as one ...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
Summary: This study explores the courtroom interactions between judges, attorneys, and parents charg...
2018 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.Children who have experienced abuse or neglect enter...
This study explores interactions between judges and caseworkers in child maltreatment cases. We exam...
The intersection of domestic violence and child maltreatment has been the subject of research and re...
In Missouri, 9,833 reports of child abuse and neglect were substantiated in fiscal year 2004 and 8,7...
Family group conferencing (FGC) and child protection mediation maximize family engagement in child w...
The authors examine the implications of G. L. v. Zumwalt, a case that resulted in a far-reaching con...
Working in the best interest of children in abuse and neglect cases is a daunting task for both lawy...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Much anecdotal information exists about problems in courts adjudicating child welfare (CW) cases. Ho...
A recurring problem which courts face is the need to resolve the conflict which arises when foster p...
From 2009 to 2016 the University of Michigan Law School served as the National Quality Improvement C...
The problems associated with long-term foster care of children have escalated over the past decade a...
The judicial role in child custody and visitation disputes has traditionally been understood as one ...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Current Le...
Summary: This study explores the courtroom interactions between judges, attorneys, and parents charg...
2018 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.Children who have experienced abuse or neglect enter...
This study explores interactions between judges and caseworkers in child maltreatment cases. We exam...
The intersection of domestic violence and child maltreatment has been the subject of research and re...
In Missouri, 9,833 reports of child abuse and neglect were substantiated in fiscal year 2004 and 8,7...
Family group conferencing (FGC) and child protection mediation maximize family engagement in child w...
The authors examine the implications of G. L. v. Zumwalt, a case that resulted in a far-reaching con...
Working in the best interest of children in abuse and neglect cases is a daunting task for both lawy...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Much anecdotal information exists about problems in courts adjudicating child welfare (CW) cases. Ho...
A recurring problem which courts face is the need to resolve the conflict which arises when foster p...
From 2009 to 2016 the University of Michigan Law School served as the National Quality Improvement C...