Appendix D. AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group.

Appendix B. Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition.

Jared J. Beck (2911361)
Daniel L. Hernández (2911364)
Jae R. Pasari (2911358)
Erika S. Zavaleta (145009)

August 2016

Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition

Appendix D. Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages.

André P. Schaffers (2913065)
Ivo P. Raemakers (2915834)
Karlè V. Sýkora (2915831)
Cajo J. F. ter Braak (252555)

August 2016

Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages

Appendix B. Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of models accounting for at least 99% of model weight.

Matthew A. Etterson (2905688)
Gerald J. Niemi (2906048)
Nicholas P. Danz (2906045)

August 2016

Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of mod...

Appendix D. AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group.

van Noordwijk, C. G. E. (Toos)
Verberk, Wilco C. E. P.
Turin, Hans
Heijerman, Theodoor
Alders, Kees
Dekoninck, Wouter
Hannig, Karsten
Regan, Eugenie
Mccormack, Stephen
Brown, Mark J. F.
Remke, Eva
Siepel, Henk
Berg, Matty P.
Bonte, Dries
Conservation Ecology Group
Ghent University
Trinity College Dublin
Radboud University Nijmegen

September 2016

AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group

Appendix A. Complete results of generalized linear models to assess the significance of differences in (1) environmental parameters between experiment and control plots, (2) density of important taxa between experiment and control plots, and (3) number of taxa and number of individuals between experiment and control plots.

Simon F. Thrush (145647)
Judi E. Hewitt (145655)
Alf Norkko (126750)
Vonda J. Cummings (244635)
Greig A. Funnell (2903294)

August 2016

Complete results of generalized linear models to assess the significance of differences in (1) envir...

Appendix C. Contribution of various covariates to the generalized additive models (GAMs) fitted to cladoceran principal components PC1 and PC2 scores for each lake.

Benjamin Alric (2927013)
Jean-Philippe Jenny (1680163)
Vincent Berthon (1388781)
Fabien Arnaud (1680166)
Cecile Pignol (2927022)
Jean-Louis Reyss (2927016)
Pierre Sabatier (2927019)
Marie-Elodie Perga (1548796)

August 2016

Contribution of various covariates to the generalized additive models (GAMs) fitted to cladoceran pr...

Appendix E. Results of additional linear mixed-effects models testing for differences in the numbers of collected individuals and estimated species richness (ACE values) between the methods that were tested in the seminatural habitats.

Westphal (2932638)
Catrin (2932620)
Riccardo Bommarco (506819)
Gabriel Carre (2932626)
Ellen Lamborn (2932617)
Nicolas Morison (2932632)
Theodora Petanidou (506820)
Simon G. Potts (195808)
Stuart P. M. Roberts (2932635)
Hajnalka Szentgyorgyi (2932623)
Thomas Tscheulin (798108)
Bernard E. Vaissiere (2932641)
Michal Woyciechowski (70385)
Jacobus C. Biesmeijer (186141)
William E. Kunin (381493)
Josef Settele (70383)
and Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter. (2932629)

August 2016

Results of additional linear mixed-effects models testing for differences in the numbers of collecte...

Appendix F. A table summarizing results from generalized linear mixed model analysis of seed recruitment study.

B. M. Connolly (2927757)
D. E. Pearson (2927754)
R. N. Mack (2927760)

August 2016

A table summarizing results from generalized linear mixed model analysis of seed recruitment study

Delta AIC scores of the best models for bachelor group size obtained within a threshold of seven AIC units, including the final model selected according to our criterion (delta AIC threshold of two units).

Andrea Marino (524301)
Ricardo Baldi (524302)

February 2014

<p>Variables included in the full model were the Intercept, season (pre vs post-reproductive), popul...

Appendix C. Supplemental tables with AIC values evaluated for selection of variables in the various models.

Haiganoush K. Preisler (2903402)
Jeffrey A. Hicke (2905013)
Alan A. Ager (2924850)
Jane L Hayes (2924853)

August 2016

Supplemental tables with AIC values evaluated for selection of variables in the various models

Appendix E. A figure showing the results of species-specific generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) of seedling emergence and survival.

C. J. Clark (2907437)
J. R. Poulsen (2907431)
D. J. Levey (2923773)

August 2016

A figure showing the results of species-specific generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) of seedling...

Appendix C. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model selection results for Huggins mark–recapture estimation of northern flying squirrel abundance in dry forests of eastern Washington.

John F. Lehmkuhl (2904095)
Keith D. Kistler (2904092)
James S. Begley (2904089)
John Boulanger (677933)

August 2016

The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model selection results for Huggins mark–recapture estimation...

Appendix B. Significant pairwise species associations and P values from spatially informed generalized estimation equations (GEEs) for above- and belowground data.

Jodi N. Price (200438)
Inga Hiiesalu (2924184)
Pille Gerhold (2924181)
Meelis Pärtel (506826)

August 2016

Significant pairwise species associations and P values from spatially informed generalized estimatio...

Appendix B. A table presenting the results of a two-way generalized linear model on temporal variability in site characteristics in bare areas.

Alf Norkko (126750)
Judi E. Hewitt (145655)
Simon F. Thrush (145647)
Greig A. Funnell (2903294)

August 2016

A table presenting the results of a two-way generalized linear model on temporal variability in site...

Appendix G. Linear mixed effects model summary statistics for the loge-transformed mean zooplankton community body size.

Pavel Kratina (702924)
Hamish S. Greig (2919053)
Patrick L. Thompson (693416)
Ticiana S. A. Carvalho-Pereira (2576797)
Jonathan B. Shurin (265901)

August 2016

Linear mixed effects model summary statistics for the loge-transformed mean zooplankton community bo...

Appendix B. Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition.

Jared J. Beck (2911361)
Daniel L. Hernández (2911364)
Jae R. Pasari (2911358)
Erika S. Zavaleta (145009)

August 2016

Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition

Appendix D. Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages.

André P. Schaffers (2913065)
Ivo P. Raemakers (2915834)
Karlè V. Sýkora (2915831)
Cajo J. F. ter Braak (252555)

August 2016

Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages

Appendix B. Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of models accounting for at least 99% of model weight.

Matthew A. Etterson (2905688)
Gerald J. Niemi (2906048)
Nicholas P. Danz (2906045)

August 2016

Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of mod...

Appendix D. AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group.

van Noordwijk, C. G. E. (Toos)
Verberk, Wilco C. E. P.
Turin, Hans
Heijerman, Theodoor
Alders, Kees
Dekoninck, Wouter
Hannig, Karsten
Regan, Eugenie
Mccormack, Stephen
Brown, Mark J. F.
Remke, Eva
Siepel, Henk
Berg, Matty P.
Bonte, Dries
Conservation Ecology Group
Ghent University
Trinity College Dublin
Radboud University Nijmegen

September 2016

AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group

Appendix A. Complete results of generalized linear models to assess the significance of differences in (1) environmental parameters between experiment and control plots, (2) density of important taxa between experiment and control plots, and (3) number of taxa and number of individuals between experiment and control plots.

Simon F. Thrush (145647)
Judi E. Hewitt (145655)
Alf Norkko (126750)
Vonda J. Cummings (244635)
Greig A. Funnell (2903294)

August 2016

Complete results of generalized linear models to assess the significance of differences in (1) envir...

Appendix C. Contribution of various covariates to the generalized additive models (GAMs) fitted to cladoceran principal components PC1 and PC2 scores for each lake.

Benjamin Alric (2927013)
Jean-Philippe Jenny (1680163)
Vincent Berthon (1388781)
Fabien Arnaud (1680166)
Cecile Pignol (2927022)
Jean-Louis Reyss (2927016)
Pierre Sabatier (2927019)
Marie-Elodie Perga (1548796)

August 2016

Contribution of various covariates to the generalized additive models (GAMs) fitted to cladoceran pr...

Appendix E. Results of additional linear mixed-effects models testing for differences in the numbers of collected individuals and estimated species richness (ACE values) between the methods that were tested in the seminatural habitats.

Westphal (2932638)
Catrin (2932620)
Riccardo Bommarco (506819)
Gabriel Carre (2932626)
Ellen Lamborn (2932617)
Nicolas Morison (2932632)
Theodora Petanidou (506820)
Simon G. Potts (195808)
Stuart P. M. Roberts (2932635)
Hajnalka Szentgyorgyi (2932623)
Thomas Tscheulin (798108)
Bernard E. Vaissiere (2932641)
Michal Woyciechowski (70385)
Jacobus C. Biesmeijer (186141)
William E. Kunin (381493)
Josef Settele (70383)
and Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter. (2932629)

August 2016

Results of additional linear mixed-effects models testing for differences in the numbers of collecte...

Appendix F. A table summarizing results from generalized linear mixed model analysis of seed recruitment study.

B. M. Connolly (2927757)
D. E. Pearson (2927754)
R. N. Mack (2927760)

August 2016

A table summarizing results from generalized linear mixed model analysis of seed recruitment study

Delta AIC scores of the best models for bachelor group size obtained within a threshold of seven AIC units, including the final model selected according to our criterion (delta AIC threshold of two units).

Andrea Marino (524301)
Ricardo Baldi (524302)

February 2014

<p>Variables included in the full model were the Intercept, season (pre vs post-reproductive), popul...

Appendix C. Supplemental tables with AIC values evaluated for selection of variables in the various models.

Haiganoush K. Preisler (2903402)
Jeffrey A. Hicke (2905013)
Alan A. Ager (2924850)
Jane L Hayes (2924853)

August 2016

Supplemental tables with AIC values evaluated for selection of variables in the various models

Appendix E. A figure showing the results of species-specific generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) of seedling emergence and survival.

C. J. Clark (2907437)
J. R. Poulsen (2907431)
D. J. Levey (2923773)

August 2016

A figure showing the results of species-specific generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) of seedling...

Appendix C. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model selection results for Huggins mark–recapture estimation of northern flying squirrel abundance in dry forests of eastern Washington.

John F. Lehmkuhl (2904095)
Keith D. Kistler (2904092)
James S. Begley (2904089)
John Boulanger (677933)

August 2016

The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) model selection results for Huggins mark–recapture estimation...

Appendix B. Significant pairwise species associations and P values from spatially informed generalized estimation equations (GEEs) for above- and belowground data.

Jodi N. Price (200438)
Inga Hiiesalu (2924184)
Pille Gerhold (2924181)
Meelis Pärtel (506826)

August 2016

Significant pairwise species associations and P values from spatially informed generalized estimatio...

Appendix B. A table presenting the results of a two-way generalized linear model on temporal variability in site characteristics in bare areas.

Alf Norkko (126750)
Judi E. Hewitt (145655)
Simon F. Thrush (145647)
Greig A. Funnell (2903294)

August 2016

A table presenting the results of a two-way generalized linear model on temporal variability in site...

Appendix G. Linear mixed effects model summary statistics for the loge-transformed mean zooplankton community body size.

Pavel Kratina (702924)
Hamish S. Greig (2919053)
Patrick L. Thompson (693416)
Ticiana S. A. Carvalho-Pereira (2576797)
Jonathan B. Shurin (265901)

August 2016

Linear mixed effects model summary statistics for the loge-transformed mean zooplankton community bo...

Appendix B. Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition.

Jared J. Beck (2911361)
Daniel L. Hernández (2911364)
Jae R. Pasari (2911358)
Erika S. Zavaleta (145009)

August 2016

Linear mixed-effects model results for time series analysis of community composition

Appendix D. Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages.

André P. Schaffers (2913065)
Ivo P. Raemakers (2915834)
Karlè V. Sýkora (2915831)
Cajo J. F. ter Braak (252555)

August 2016

Details on the variables selected in the optimal models predicting arthropod assemblages

Appendix B. Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of models accounting for at least 99% of model weight.

Matthew A. Etterson (2905688)
Gerald J. Niemi (2906048)
Nicholas P. Danz (2906045)

August 2016

Species list, models, and AIC tables for all sixteen species reporting the minimal (best) set of mod...

Appendix D. AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group.

Abstract

Extracted data

Appendix D. AIC scores for the generalized linear mixed models of activity density per habitat preference group.

Abstract

Extracted data

Topics

Related items

Topics

Related items