[BOOK REVIEW]De Vos, Jan (2013) Psychologization and the subject of late modernity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-30846-6 hbk. Pages xi + 189. Jan de Vos’ starting point in the Psychologization and the subject of late modernity is the gap between being and knowledge. In other words, between how people are as psychological subjects and how they could be as psychologized subjects. He argues, as he has elsewhere, that psychologization is not simply a spillover of psychology into society but that psychology is psychologization. Psychologization is psychology’s paradigm
The subject of psychosis: A Lacanian perspective, by Stijn Vanheule, London & New York, Palgrave-Mac...
Psychologization is not a consensual concept, nor within the literature of (critical) psychology, no...
A major flaw of the book is its failure to note Wittgenstein’s role in destroying the mechanical or ...
Jan De Vos starts where other critiques on psychology end, presenting the argument that psychology i...
Why have sociologists tended to overlook the work of their colleagues in the field of psychology? Th...
Is not the most intriguing aspect of psychologisation seems to be that every critique threatens to b...
Before remarking on “The New Science of the Mind”, I first offer some comments on philosophy and its...
Today more than ever, our understanding of ourselves, others and the world around us is described in...
LeShan laments both the condition of psychotherapeutic practice and the fact that psychologists have...
This is a book whose time has come. It collects papers presented at a symposium on applied psycholog...
A superb effort, but in my view Wittgenstein (i.e., philosophy or the descriptive psychology of high...
[BOOK REVIEW]Parker, Ian (2015) Psychology after the crisis: Scientific paradigms and political deba...
A major flaw of the book is its failure to note Wittgenstein’s role in destroying the mechanical or ...
The subject of psychosis: A Lacanian perspective, by Stijn Vanheule, London & New York, Palgrave-Mac...
Psychologization is not a consensual concept, nor within the literature of (critical) psychology, no...
A major flaw of the book is its failure to note Wittgenstein’s role in destroying the mechanical or ...
Jan De Vos starts where other critiques on psychology end, presenting the argument that psychology i...
Why have sociologists tended to overlook the work of their colleagues in the field of psychology? Th...
Is not the most intriguing aspect of psychologisation seems to be that every critique threatens to b...
Before remarking on “The New Science of the Mind”, I first offer some comments on philosophy and its...
Today more than ever, our understanding of ourselves, others and the world around us is described in...
LeShan laments both the condition of psychotherapeutic practice and the fact that psychologists have...
This is a book whose time has come. It collects papers presented at a symposium on applied psycholog...
A superb effort, but in my view Wittgenstein (i.e., philosophy or the descriptive psychology of high...
[BOOK REVIEW]Parker, Ian (2015) Psychology after the crisis: Scientific paradigms and political deba...
A major flaw of the book is its failure to note Wittgenstein’s role in destroying the mechanical or ...
The subject of psychosis: A Lacanian perspective, by Stijn Vanheule, London & New York, Palgrave-Mac...
Psychologization is not a consensual concept, nor within the literature of (critical) psychology, no...
A major flaw of the book is its failure to note Wittgenstein’s role in destroying the mechanical or ...