For his widespread image as an "atheist," Thomas Hobbes has been regarded as a purely secular thinker, highly critical of all religion. And most scholars have ignored the second half of Leviathan, which could be characterized as another Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Recently, though, situation has been changing. Hobbes scholars, particularly those writing in English, can be divided into two groups; those who insist on a traditional secular interpretation, which has its origin in the highly influential works of Leo Strauss, and those who propose a religious interpretation, which could ironically be called revolutionary, originally inspired by "Taylor-Warrender Thesis." But I think this conflict of two interpretations is raised upon a wrong...