Abstract Background Oncology drugs are frequently approved on the basis of surrogate outcomes that require further trials to confirm the benefits, but at times these trials fail and regulators need to decide whether to withdraw approval for the indication and/or to remove the drug from the market. This study compares decisions by the Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada about oncology drugs that were approved using either Accelerated Approval (FDA) or Notice of Compliance with conditions (NOC/c, Health Canada) and that failed confirmatory trials. Methods Drug/indications approved by the FDA through its Accelerated Approval ...
Regulatory agencies around the world have been using flexible requirements for approval of new drugs...
ImportanceAlthough several cancer drugs receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval each ...
Innovative characteristics of gene and cell-based therapy products (GCTs) often hinder standardized ...
Accelerated approval (AA) by the FDA enables earlier access to promising new therapies. Health Canad...
Objectives Investigate if the recommendations by the Common Drug Review (CDR) and the pa...
Real-world evidence (RWE) is health and outcomes data generated from a patient’s journey through the...
Objectives: This study examines the characteristics of studies that Health Canada uses to grant full...
Policy Points Regulatory agencies may have limited evidence on the clinical benefits and harms of ne...
Regulatory authorization of oncology drugs, including immune-checkpoint inhibitors, is often based o...
Importance: Numerous cancer drugs have received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Admin...
We assessed the frequency that oncology drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA...
Over the years, there have been significant advances in oncology. However, the rate that therapeutic...
Introduction: Over the years, there have been significant advances in oncology. However, the rate th...
Background: To determine the magnitude of difference between manufacturer-submitted and pan-Canadian...
We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. ...
Regulatory agencies around the world have been using flexible requirements for approval of new drugs...
ImportanceAlthough several cancer drugs receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval each ...
Innovative characteristics of gene and cell-based therapy products (GCTs) often hinder standardized ...
Accelerated approval (AA) by the FDA enables earlier access to promising new therapies. Health Canad...
Objectives Investigate if the recommendations by the Common Drug Review (CDR) and the pa...
Real-world evidence (RWE) is health and outcomes data generated from a patient’s journey through the...
Objectives: This study examines the characteristics of studies that Health Canada uses to grant full...
Policy Points Regulatory agencies may have limited evidence on the clinical benefits and harms of ne...
Regulatory authorization of oncology drugs, including immune-checkpoint inhibitors, is often based o...
Importance: Numerous cancer drugs have received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Admin...
We assessed the frequency that oncology drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA...
Over the years, there have been significant advances in oncology. However, the rate that therapeutic...
Introduction: Over the years, there have been significant advances in oncology. However, the rate th...
Background: To determine the magnitude of difference between manufacturer-submitted and pan-Canadian...
We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. ...
Regulatory agencies around the world have been using flexible requirements for approval of new drugs...
ImportanceAlthough several cancer drugs receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval each ...
Innovative characteristics of gene and cell-based therapy products (GCTs) often hinder standardized ...