Preliminary geotechnical assessment of the potential use of mixtures of soil and acid mine drainage neutralisation sludge as material for the moisture retention layer of covers with capillary barrier effects

Lime treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) generates sludge that is commonly stored in ponds for dewatering. The use of soil-aged sludge-based mixtures for mine site rehabilitation can allow emptying existing basins, extending their storage capacity, reducing the volume of borrow soil pit required for mine site rehabilitation, and consequently reducing the mine footprint. The authors investigated the geotechnical properties of silty soil–sludge mixtures (SSM) as possible component of covers with capillary barrier effects (CCBE) to prevent AMD generation from mine waste. SSM with 10, 15, 20, and 25% sludge (= wet sludge mass/wet soil mass) were studied. Two water contents were considered for each of the mixture components: 175 and 200% for the sludge and 7.5 and 12.5% for the soil. Results indicated that saturated hydraulic conductivity values ksat were in the range of 10-5 cm/s for the soil and SSM mixtures at void ratios ranging from 0.28 to 0.53, with values slightly decreasing when β was increased from 0 % to 25%. The air entry value (AEV) increased from 20 kPa for the soil alone to 35 kPa for the SSM with β= 25%. These values of ksat and AEV are comparable to those of materials used in the moisture retention layers of existing efficient CCBE. However, the volumetric shrinkage increased from about 2% for the soil alone to values ranging between 24 and 32% for the SSM with β = 25%, depending on the initial water contents of the components. Tools are provided to estimate to which extent the use of sludge in SSM can reduce the volume of borrow natural soil required for a moisture retention layer of a CCBE.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author