The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. But as the decision in Oil States last Term revealed, the Court has often used the term to refer to three different concepts with different jurisprudential implications. Using insights drawn from historical and analytical jurisprudence, this Article distinguishes the three concepts and examines how each of them is at work in patent law. A precise reading of Oil States also bears lessons for other areas of law that implicate both private rights and duties and the administration of public regulatory schemes
The Article proceeds as follows. Part I summarizes the evolution of the current standard for justici...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that, when a regulation has depri...
Petitioner Oil States Energy Services sued respondent Greene’s Energy Group in a district court on s...
The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of th...
Law promises much but does not always deliver. It promises due process, equal protection, equity, an...
The greatest challenge for any civilized society is to find the appropriate balance of rights and re...
PUBLIC RIGHTS, PRIVATE PRIVILEGES, AND ARTICLE III John Harrison* This Article addresses the constit...
The intersection of property rights and energy resource development is an increasingly important, an...
The public trust doctrine is often accused of undermining property rights, when in fact the doctrine...
Public concern about environmental quality is beginning to be felt in the courtroom. Private citizen...
“The patent bargain is the foundation upon which the patent system is built: in exchange for protect...
This Article explores two recent Supreme Court cases—Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Ge...
Copyright law is at a crossroads. In the wake of Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Gr...
Historically, patent litigation has been viewed and treated primarily as private law litigation, as ...
The rights/freedoms dichotomy tacitly permeates Supreme Court ‘takings\u27 jurisprudence, and it has...
The Article proceeds as follows. Part I summarizes the evolution of the current standard for justici...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that, when a regulation has depri...
Petitioner Oil States Energy Services sued respondent Greene’s Energy Group in a district court on s...
The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of th...
Law promises much but does not always deliver. It promises due process, equal protection, equity, an...
The greatest challenge for any civilized society is to find the appropriate balance of rights and re...
PUBLIC RIGHTS, PRIVATE PRIVILEGES, AND ARTICLE III John Harrison* This Article addresses the constit...
The intersection of property rights and energy resource development is an increasingly important, an...
The public trust doctrine is often accused of undermining property rights, when in fact the doctrine...
Public concern about environmental quality is beginning to be felt in the courtroom. Private citizen...
“The patent bargain is the foundation upon which the patent system is built: in exchange for protect...
This Article explores two recent Supreme Court cases—Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Ge...
Copyright law is at a crossroads. In the wake of Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Gr...
Historically, patent litigation has been viewed and treated primarily as private law litigation, as ...
The rights/freedoms dichotomy tacitly permeates Supreme Court ‘takings\u27 jurisprudence, and it has...
The Article proceeds as follows. Part I summarizes the evolution of the current standard for justici...
In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court held that, when a regulation has depri...
Petitioner Oil States Energy Services sued respondent Greene’s Energy Group in a district court on s...