[First Paragraph] In his recent book, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory (1998), Wayne Davis argues that the Gricean approach to conversational implicature is bankrupt and offers a new approach of his own. Although I disagree with Davis both in general and in detail, I think nonetheless that the problems he raises'or close relatives of them-- are serious and important problems which should give any Gricean pause. This is an extremely worthwhile book, even for those who disagree with it
Imagination and Convention by Ernie Lepore and Matthew Stone is a sustained attack on a standard pie...
Paul Grice, the British philosopher of language, aimed to present a framework for conversational imp...
In this paper we analyze and discuss Jennifer Saul’s account of the famous Gricean notions...
Conversational implicature is (roughly) the practice of conveying one thing by saying another. Philo...
H. P. Grice is widely accredited with the discovery of implicature, that which is not literally said...
[First Paragraph] Unlike so many other distinctions in philosophy, H P Grice's distinction between w...
This paper advances the following criticisms against the received view of implicatures: (1) implicat...
As the title suggests, the primary concern of this study is with problems arising from a very widely...
While never himself employing the term ‘pragmatics’, Paul Grice laid out the map for modern pragmati...
Gricean implicatures are often viewed as a very weak kind of implication, viz., as optional enrichme...
Somerset Maugham’s writings in general and short stories in particular did not receive the critical ...
H. P. Grice first presented his theory of conversational implicature in “Logic and Conversation.” T...
Paul Grice\u27s conversational implicature is a widely studied and commonly accepted theory in the f...
According to standard pragmat-ics, we should account for conver-sational implicatures in terms of Gr...
A misunderstanding of Grice's distinction between saying and implicating leads at least one theorist...
Imagination and Convention by Ernie Lepore and Matthew Stone is a sustained attack on a standard pie...
Paul Grice, the British philosopher of language, aimed to present a framework for conversational imp...
In this paper we analyze and discuss Jennifer Saul’s account of the famous Gricean notions...
Conversational implicature is (roughly) the practice of conveying one thing by saying another. Philo...
H. P. Grice is widely accredited with the discovery of implicature, that which is not literally said...
[First Paragraph] Unlike so many other distinctions in philosophy, H P Grice's distinction between w...
This paper advances the following criticisms against the received view of implicatures: (1) implicat...
As the title suggests, the primary concern of this study is with problems arising from a very widely...
While never himself employing the term ‘pragmatics’, Paul Grice laid out the map for modern pragmati...
Gricean implicatures are often viewed as a very weak kind of implication, viz., as optional enrichme...
Somerset Maugham’s writings in general and short stories in particular did not receive the critical ...
H. P. Grice first presented his theory of conversational implicature in “Logic and Conversation.” T...
Paul Grice\u27s conversational implicature is a widely studied and commonly accepted theory in the f...
According to standard pragmat-ics, we should account for conver-sational implicatures in terms of Gr...
A misunderstanding of Grice's distinction between saying and implicating leads at least one theorist...
Imagination and Convention by Ernie Lepore and Matthew Stone is a sustained attack on a standard pie...
Paul Grice, the British philosopher of language, aimed to present a framework for conversational imp...
In this paper we analyze and discuss Jennifer Saul’s account of the famous Gricean notions...