Proving a medical error in civil proceedings is characterized by certain differences, which have been shaped mainly in judicial practice. They are characterized, first of all, by a reduced rigor of evidence and the special importance of certain evidence. Among them, one should mention evidence from medical records, which in this text will be analyzed from the perspective of jurisprudence and in the context of regulations defining the manner of keeping this documentation. The conclusions drawn in this way will be confronted with the practice of keeping medical records from the perspective of the entity providing health services and the postulates of informatization of the health care system.Dowodzenie błędu medycznego w postępowaniu cywiln...
The subject of the judgement with commentaries is the issue of a “dezubekizacyjna case” pending in c...
The aim of this paper is reconstruction of a civil law model (standard of diligence), releated to th...
The paper contains a critical commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision of January 11, 2017 (III KK...
Proving a medical error in civil proceedings is characterized by certain differences, which have bee...
Judgments (rulings and decisions) issued in administrative court procedures can be affected by minor...
This text is a review of the monograph devoted to the criminal law boundaries of innovative medical ...
In the analized ruling, the author critically refers to the decision of the Supreme Administrative C...
The purpose of the gloss is to analyse the impact of the amendment to the provisions on atypical rec...
Patients' rights refer to all stages of the process of providing healthcare services and its various...
The objective of this paper is to present the amendments to the Patients’ rights and Patients’ Right...
The article is about several procedural issues connected with seeking redress for nuclear damages on...
In the commented judgement, the court discharged the responsibility of individuals who presented ban...
The paper is devoted to the most problematic issues of the institution of disinheritance, both in th...
The subject of the judgement with commentaries is the issue of a “dezubekizacyjna case” pending in c...
The aim of this paper is reconstruction of a civil law model (standard of diligence), releated to th...
The paper contains a critical commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision of January 11, 2017 (III KK...
Proving a medical error in civil proceedings is characterized by certain differences, which have bee...
Judgments (rulings and decisions) issued in administrative court procedures can be affected by minor...
This text is a review of the monograph devoted to the criminal law boundaries of innovative medical ...
In the analized ruling, the author critically refers to the decision of the Supreme Administrative C...
The purpose of the gloss is to analyse the impact of the amendment to the provisions on atypical rec...
Patients' rights refer to all stages of the process of providing healthcare services and its various...
The objective of this paper is to present the amendments to the Patients’ rights and Patients’ Right...
The article is about several procedural issues connected with seeking redress for nuclear damages on...
In the commented judgement, the court discharged the responsibility of individuals who presented ban...
The paper is devoted to the most problematic issues of the institution of disinheritance, both in th...
The subject of the judgement with commentaries is the issue of a “dezubekizacyjna case” pending in c...
The aim of this paper is reconstruction of a civil law model (standard of diligence), releated to th...
The paper contains a critical commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision of January 11, 2017 (III KK...