Agnostics as well as theists should answer evidential arguments from evil, at least when confronted with them. In this paper, I answer such an argument by appealing to sceptical agnosticism. A sceptical agnostic is not only undecided about the existence of a perfectly good and omnipotent God, but also believes that we cannot make any judgement about whether or not seemingly gratuitous evil probably is gratuitous. I argue that such agnosticism has several advantages compared with sceptical theism
Does evil constitute any evidence against the existence of God? Stephen Wykstra argues that it does ...
Arguments from evil claim that the existence and prevalence of pain and suffering count as evidence ...
Natural disasters would seem to constitute evidence against the existence of God, for, on the face o...
Agnostics as well as theists should answer evidential arguments from evil, at least when confronted ...
Agnosticism has always had its fair amount of criticism. Religious believers often described the fir...
One way to rebut the standard evidential problem of evil is to develop a sceptical form of theism. T...
I endorse the following claims in this paper. (1) Agnosticism is suspension of judgment on existence...
In 'Weak agnosticism defended' Graham Oppy set out to ’show that agnosticism can be so formulated th...
In this paper, I sketch an argument for the view that we cannot know (or have good reasons to believ...
According to a simple Bayesian argument from evil, the evil we observe is less likely given theism t...
According to Agnosticism with a capital A, even if we don’t see how any reason we know of would just...
This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there...
Skeptical theism combines theism with skepticism about our capacity to discern God’s morally suffici...
Pointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and ...
Does evil constitute any evidence against the existence of God? Stephen Wykstra argues that it does ...
Arguments from evil claim that the existence and prevalence of pain and suffering count as evidence ...
Natural disasters would seem to constitute evidence against the existence of God, for, on the face o...
Agnostics as well as theists should answer evidential arguments from evil, at least when confronted ...
Agnosticism has always had its fair amount of criticism. Religious believers often described the fir...
One way to rebut the standard evidential problem of evil is to develop a sceptical form of theism. T...
I endorse the following claims in this paper. (1) Agnosticism is suspension of judgment on existence...
In 'Weak agnosticism defended' Graham Oppy set out to ’show that agnosticism can be so formulated th...
In this paper, I sketch an argument for the view that we cannot know (or have good reasons to believ...
According to a simple Bayesian argument from evil, the evil we observe is less likely given theism t...
According to Agnosticism with a capital A, even if we don’t see how any reason we know of would just...
This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there...
Skeptical theism combines theism with skepticism about our capacity to discern God’s morally suffici...
Pointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and ...
Does evil constitute any evidence against the existence of God? Stephen Wykstra argues that it does ...
Arguments from evil claim that the existence and prevalence of pain and suffering count as evidence ...
Natural disasters would seem to constitute evidence against the existence of God, for, on the face o...