Technology War and the State:past, present and future

War made the state, and the state made war, but does this statement hold true today? Will it apply in the future? The consensus is that the absence of major war within the western world, post 1945, did cause the war–state relationship to change, but each became significantly less important to the other. This thought piece argues the relationship was closer and deeper than has been assumed. I propose that the peculiar strategic conditions created by the nuclear age caused states to wage a ritualistic style of war in which demonstration rather than the physical application of violence became increasingly important. Within this setting, the state drove the process of technological innovation in defence to its limits in an effort to demonstrate its military superiority. This massive peacetime investment in defence technology exerted a huge impact on the character of war, which led to new strategic forms. However, most importantly, the diffusion of military technology also affected the wider economy and society, leading to a form of internal power transition within states. I speculate on how these elemental forces will play out in the future, what will happen to war and the state, and we will reach a point where war leads to the unmaking of the state.