Collaboration leads us to judge our own ability to be more similar to our collaborator and their ability to be more similar to our own, while competition leads us to exaggerate the gap between our abilities. How does this happen and what does it mean
This investigation examines how upward social comparisons, comparing oneself to another who is perce...
Agreement between the self and other rated personality profiles was studied in two samples involving...
Do agents believe to be agreeing more with others in the long-run? This paper designs an experiment ...
Collaboration leads us to judge our own ability to be more similar to our collaborators and their ab...
Collaboration leads us to judge our own ability to be more similar to our collaborators and their ab...
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordTo survi...
Humans are highly social beings who are interested in what others are saying, thinking, and doing. A...
Humans are highly social beings who are interested in what others are saying, thinking, and doing. A...
SummaryTo survive, humans must estimate their own ability and the abilities of others. We found that...
Not all cognitive collaborations are equally effective. We tested whether friendship and communicati...
The present study examined the role of target and judge interaction demands on first impression accu...
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by a PhD grant from Plymouth University to Kimberley S...
This paper investigates the impact of referee behaviour on the quality and efficiency of peer review...
Interacting to reach a shared decision is an omnipresent component of human collaboration. We explor...
Groups and organisations set cooperative goals for their members, yet in reality some team members c...
This investigation examines how upward social comparisons, comparing oneself to another who is perce...
Agreement between the self and other rated personality profiles was studied in two samples involving...
Do agents believe to be agreeing more with others in the long-run? This paper designs an experiment ...
Collaboration leads us to judge our own ability to be more similar to our collaborators and their ab...
Collaboration leads us to judge our own ability to be more similar to our collaborators and their ab...
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordTo survi...
Humans are highly social beings who are interested in what others are saying, thinking, and doing. A...
Humans are highly social beings who are interested in what others are saying, thinking, and doing. A...
SummaryTo survive, humans must estimate their own ability and the abilities of others. We found that...
Not all cognitive collaborations are equally effective. We tested whether friendship and communicati...
The present study examined the role of target and judge interaction demands on first impression accu...
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by a PhD grant from Plymouth University to Kimberley S...
This paper investigates the impact of referee behaviour on the quality and efficiency of peer review...
Interacting to reach a shared decision is an omnipresent component of human collaboration. We explor...
Groups and organisations set cooperative goals for their members, yet in reality some team members c...
This investigation examines how upward social comparisons, comparing oneself to another who is perce...
Agreement between the self and other rated personality profiles was studied in two samples involving...
Do agents believe to be agreeing more with others in the long-run? This paper designs an experiment ...
DOI
Add to ORKG