In June 2007, the US Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v PSKS, Inc., DBA Kay's Kloset. Kay's Shoes overruled the nearly century old per se rule against RPM in the US, holding that such arrangements should be analysed under the rule of reason. This article considers whether developments in economic thinking, and the Supreme Court's Opinion in Leegin, might, or should, prompt a rethink or equivalent U-turn in competition policy towards RPM in the EU. The article commences by examining the arguments and factors which led the Supreme Court to overturn such an entrenched and long-standing rule against RPM. It then considers whether these factors, or other similar factors, might be influential in the development of EU competi...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is an important and very controversial pricing practice that describe...
In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court overruled its 1911 p...
Is free riding bad for competition in the markets? Is it good and necessary to promote competition i...
For decades, vertical restraints and especially resale price maintenance (RPM) have been considered ...
Over recent years, there have been important divergences in thinking among economists and lawyers ab...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., which r...
The United States and the European Union operate in the world’s two most powerful systems of competi...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is a contentious topic in economic policy. In effect, it allows manuf...
Leegin decision of the Supreme Court in 2007 affirmed that minimum RPM was to be evaluated under the...
ABSTRACT: The paper deals with a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of vertical price restraint...
The paper sets out why we consider that the legal framework in the EU amplifies what are in reality ...
Minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are t...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) can be either pro competitive, by improving efficiency or facilitatin...
This essay examines how European competition law can move toward an improved analytical framework fo...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is an important and very controversial pricing practice that describe...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is an important and very controversial pricing practice that describe...
In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court overruled its 1911 p...
Is free riding bad for competition in the markets? Is it good and necessary to promote competition i...
For decades, vertical restraints and especially resale price maintenance (RPM) have been considered ...
Over recent years, there have been important divergences in thinking among economists and lawyers ab...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., which r...
The United States and the European Union operate in the world’s two most powerful systems of competi...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is a contentious topic in economic policy. In effect, it allows manuf...
Leegin decision of the Supreme Court in 2007 affirmed that minimum RPM was to be evaluated under the...
ABSTRACT: The paper deals with a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of vertical price restraint...
The paper sets out why we consider that the legal framework in the EU amplifies what are in reality ...
Minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are t...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) can be either pro competitive, by improving efficiency or facilitatin...
This essay examines how European competition law can move toward an improved analytical framework fo...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is an important and very controversial pricing practice that describe...
Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) is an important and very controversial pricing practice that describe...
In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court overruled its 1911 p...
Is free riding bad for competition in the markets? Is it good and necessary to promote competition i...