In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figure presented.) Interpretation of the binned and phase-space (‘PS’) integrated measurements in terms to the underlying physics parameters. The (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) contours are shown, which correspond to (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)) and (Formula presented.) ((Formula presented.)) confidence intervals, respectively. Also shown is the result from the analysis of other decay modes at LHCb (‘LHCb 2021’) [21] The original article has been corrected. The publisher apologizes for the inconvenience caused
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
: The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK∗± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], du...
The measurements of Aππand RKKin B±→ DK*±decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to a...
The measurements of Aππand RKKin B±→ DK*±decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to a...
The measurements of A\u3c0\u3c0 and RKK in B\ub1 \u2192 DK*\ub1 decays were incorrectly reported in ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
In the original article, the PDF version is missing Fig. 8. The correct Fig. 8 is shown here. (Figur...
: The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK∗± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], du...
The measurements of Aππand RKKin B±→ DK*±decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to a...
The measurements of Aππand RKKin B±→ DK*±decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to a...
The measurements of A\u3c0\u3c0 and RKK in B\ub1 \u2192 DK*\ub1 decays were incorrectly reported in ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The measurements of Aππ and RKK in B± → DK*± decays were incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due ...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...
The B+ and B− labels of the confidence regions in figure 10 of the original paper [1] were erroneous...