David Hume advances a reductionist epistemology of testimony: testimonial beliefs are justified on the basis of beliefs formed from other sources. This reduction, however, has been misunderstood. Testimonial beliefs are not justified in a manner identical to ordinary empirical beliefs; it is true, they are justified by observation of the conjunction between testimony and its truth, but the nature of the conjunctions has been misunderstood. The observation of these conjunctions provides us with our knowledge of human nature and it is this knowledge which justifies our testimonial beliefs. Hume gives a naturalistic rather than a sceptical account of testimony
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...
The assumption that we largely lack reasons for accepting testimony has dominated its epistemology. ...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
Abstract This dissertation discusses one of the most fundamental issues of the epistemology of te...
This chapter states the contrast between presumptivism about testimonial warrant (often called anti-...
This chapter states the contrast between presumptivism about testimonial warrant (often called anti-...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
The majority of what you believe is based on the testimony of others; what your parents and teachers...
In Conspiracies and Lyes I aim to provide an epistemological account of testimony as one of our facu...
The paper is concerned with the epistemological status of testimony and the question of what may con...
It's generally agreed that testimony can be a source of knowledge and justified belief. The epistemo...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...
The assumption that we largely lack reasons for accepting testimony has dominated its epistemology. ...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
Abstract This dissertation discusses one of the most fundamental issues of the epistemology of te...
This chapter states the contrast between presumptivism about testimonial warrant (often called anti-...
This chapter states the contrast between presumptivism about testimonial warrant (often called anti-...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
The majority of what you believe is based on the testimony of others; what your parents and teachers...
In Conspiracies and Lyes I aim to provide an epistemological account of testimony as one of our facu...
The paper is concerned with the epistemological status of testimony and the question of what may con...
It's generally agreed that testimony can be a source of knowledge and justified belief. The epistemo...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
This paper identifies two distinct dimensions of what might be called testimonial strength: first, i...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...
How does the monitoring of a testifier's credibility by recipients of testimony bear upon the episte...