In this chapter, I investigate a problem for Kant’s claim that metaphysics can reach the status of science. The problem arises when one considers Kant’s account of the “architectonic unity” of metaphysics in the Architectonic of Pure Reason. Attaining architectonic unity is a condition for becoming a science for any body of cognitions that purports to be such. This is achieved when the cognitions belonging to a science are systematically organized according to the “idea of reason” which lies at the basis of that science. However, Kant suggests that nobody can ever legitimately claim to have matched the idea of the philosopher, where this appears to imply that nobody can justifiably claim that she has fully grasped the idea of metaphysics. T...
© 1977 Dr. Andrew Charles TheophanousThis thesis begins with an outline of Kant's three types of met...
In two often neglected passages of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant submits that the Critique is a ...
The present paper aims to trace back Kant’s account of the schematism of the pure understanding in t...
In this chapter, I investigate a problem for Kant’s claim that metaphysics can reach the status of s...
My paper focuses on what and how Kant had accomplished with his intended “re- form of meta...
I raise a problem about the possibility of metaphysics originally raised by Kant: what explains the ...
In this propaedeutic work, through Kant’s own texts, I will try to offer a balanced description and ...
This dissertation presents and responds to the following problem. For Kant a field of enquiry can ...
I argue in this thesis that the topic of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is an epistemology...
In this propaedeutic work, through Kant’s own texts, I will try to offer a balanced description and ...
This article considers the significance of Kant’s schematized categories in the Critique of Pure Rea...
One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of met...
In this chapter I highlight the apparent tensions between Kant’s very stringent critique of metaphys...
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered m...
© 1977 Dr. Andrew Charles TheophanousThis thesis begins with an outline of Kant's three types of met...
In two often neglected passages of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant submits that the Critique is a ...
The present paper aims to trace back Kant’s account of the schematism of the pure understanding in t...
In this chapter, I investigate a problem for Kant’s claim that metaphysics can reach the status of s...
My paper focuses on what and how Kant had accomplished with his intended “re- form of meta...
I raise a problem about the possibility of metaphysics originally raised by Kant: what explains the ...
In this propaedeutic work, through Kant’s own texts, I will try to offer a balanced description and ...
This dissertation presents and responds to the following problem. For Kant a field of enquiry can ...
I argue in this thesis that the topic of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is an epistemology...
In this propaedeutic work, through Kant’s own texts, I will try to offer a balanced description and ...
This article considers the significance of Kant’s schematized categories in the Critique of Pure Rea...
One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of met...
In this chapter I highlight the apparent tensions between Kant’s very stringent critique of metaphys...
There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered m...
© 1977 Dr. Andrew Charles TheophanousThis thesis begins with an outline of Kant's three types of met...
In two often neglected passages of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant submits that the Critique is a ...
The present paper aims to trace back Kant’s account of the schematism of the pure understanding in t...