In-depth logical analysis of special relativity

In this paper, we deeply analysis Einstein's two famous papers that regard special relativity in every aspect. We discuss in every detail with respect to inconsistency of the simultaneity, relativity of length and time, derivations and interpretations of Lorentz transformation. We identified that the special relativity is only a postulate. This postulate is for eliminating the conflict between the observation (' = ̵̶ ) as per Galilean transformation (assuming it is correct) and the principle of relativity (' = ). The time dilation is based on a thought experiment of inconsistency of simultaneity, and length contraction is based on time dilation. We have concluded in previous paper that Galilean transformation is incorrect, and have identified in this paper that inconsistency of simultaneity does not exists, therefore, the reason for the postulate of special relativity is not convincing. This paper derived Logical transformation to replace Lorentz transformation. We identified the derivations and interpretations of Lorentz transformation do not satisfy logical self-consistent. We concluded when we observe particle motions in a moving frame, the moving frame's math time is not equal to its physical time.This paper is the fourth part of my monograph titled "Logical Transformation versus Special Relativity". We identified that special relativity is only a postulate which is based on an assumption of both Galilean transformation and principle of relativity are correct. We concluded that the thought experiment of simultaneity inconsistency, time dilation and length contraction, and the derivations and interpretations of Lorentz transformation are all not able to satisfy logical self-consistent