Constitutional pluralism, through its contestation of finality and conclusiveness, highlights the role of particular institutions which take decisions of constitutional significance. This paper argues that this institutional dimension is one of constitutional pluralism’s principal virtues. Most theories of European constitutionalism do not recognize this and leave important questions unexplored. Those that do so focus too much on conflict and choice. The paper proposes the reorientation of institutional analysis toward communication and involvement
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it want to achieve, contribute,...
This article examines the normative political theory underlying the legal doctrine of constitutional...
The deep transformation of the practice of European law calls for a systematic rethinking of the the...
Constitutional pluralism, through its contestation of finality and conclusiveness, highlights the ro...
Constitutional pluralism seems to be one of the most inspiring theories of European constitutionalis...
Constitutional pluralism seems to be one of the most inspiring theories of European constitutionalis...
Constitutional pluralism is a novel branch within constitutional thought and has its origin in the s...
Theories of constitutional pluralism have used the same conceptual root upon which pluralistic democ...
The chapter argues that constitutional pluralism has insufficiently taken into account democratic co...
Pluralism has made its way into European law literature already a long time ago. Some of its main ...
Constitutional pluralism has become immensely popular among scholars who study European integration ...
The paper deals with the validity of constitutional pluralism as a constitutional theory for the Eur...
The international legal order, although pluralist in structure, is in the process of being constitut...
Though constitutional pluralism has become well established as a way of thinking about EU constituti...
Moving from the assumption that traditional decision making based on direct or representative Democr...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it want to achieve, contribute,...
This article examines the normative political theory underlying the legal doctrine of constitutional...
The deep transformation of the practice of European law calls for a systematic rethinking of the the...
Constitutional pluralism, through its contestation of finality and conclusiveness, highlights the ro...
Constitutional pluralism seems to be one of the most inspiring theories of European constitutionalis...
Constitutional pluralism seems to be one of the most inspiring theories of European constitutionalis...
Constitutional pluralism is a novel branch within constitutional thought and has its origin in the s...
Theories of constitutional pluralism have used the same conceptual root upon which pluralistic democ...
The chapter argues that constitutional pluralism has insufficiently taken into account democratic co...
Pluralism has made its way into European law literature already a long time ago. Some of its main ...
Constitutional pluralism has become immensely popular among scholars who study European integration ...
The paper deals with the validity of constitutional pluralism as a constitutional theory for the Eur...
The international legal order, although pluralist in structure, is in the process of being constitut...
Though constitutional pluralism has become well established as a way of thinking about EU constituti...
Moving from the assumption that traditional decision making based on direct or representative Democr...
What is constitutional pluralism? What does it stand for? What does it want to achieve, contribute,...
This article examines the normative political theory underlying the legal doctrine of constitutional...
The deep transformation of the practice of European law calls for a systematic rethinking of the the...