Objectives: To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic reviews and identified in electronic databases are applicable to an example from medical imaging. Methods: A systematic review was performed. Additionally, sensitivity and precision of a MEDLINE search were compared with values from three published searches, each customized for a specific field. Results: All articles included in the systematic review were in electronic databases. The MEDLINE search had low precision compared with searches in other fields. Conclusions: in a specific area of medical imaging, electronic databases, including MEDLINE, are reliable sources of articles
OBJECTIVES: The search filters in PubMed have become a cornerstone in information retrieval in evide...
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (CT) is an increasingly important resource for systematic reviewers ...
Objectives: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or...
Objectives: To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic r...
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of systematic reviews evaluating the diagnostic test accuracy of tech...
Background and Objectives: Methods to identify studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Methods to identify studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy...
Objectives: Errors in search strategies negatively affect the quality and validity of systematic rev...
Background: Systematic reviews are essential for decision‐making. Systematic reviews on observationa...
Background: systematic reviews are of increasing importance to health care professionals seeking to ...
Background: Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for systematic review (...
The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (...
Background: Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for sy...
Introduction: Systematic reviews aim to find and synthesize all relevant research as a basis for evi...
To compare the performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test ac...
OBJECTIVES: The search filters in PubMed have become a cornerstone in information retrieval in evide...
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (CT) is an increasingly important resource for systematic reviewers ...
Objectives: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or...
Objectives: To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic r...
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of systematic reviews evaluating the diagnostic test accuracy of tech...
Background and Objectives: Methods to identify studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Methods to identify studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy...
Objectives: Errors in search strategies negatively affect the quality and validity of systematic rev...
Background: Systematic reviews are essential for decision‐making. Systematic reviews on observationa...
Background: systematic reviews are of increasing importance to health care professionals seeking to ...
Background: Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for systematic review (...
The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (...
Background: Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for sy...
Introduction: Systematic reviews aim to find and synthesize all relevant research as a basis for evi...
To compare the performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test ac...
OBJECTIVES: The search filters in PubMed have become a cornerstone in information retrieval in evide...
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (CT) is an increasingly important resource for systematic reviewers ...
Objectives: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or...