The Review Assessment Rubric is meant for anyone who is evaluating a research manuscript’s review. This may include a teacher in the context of peer review training, a peer helping the review author evaluate their review, or even the review author themselves to self-evaluate their own review. The rubric comprises 10 statements for which the evaluator is asked to provide a score and a written comment to help improve the review. This Review Assessment Rubric is part of a toolkit developed in the context of PREreview Open Reviewers. The other two guides published in the toolkit are the Bias Reflection Guide and the Reviewer Guide
BACKGROUND: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
Background: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
[EN] In the recent context of student-centered learning, they are more involved in the whole learni...
The Reviewer Guide is meant for anyone who is reviewing a research manuscript. It provides a compreh...
Disclosures: This rubric was created collaboratively by undergraduates at Mount Holyoke College (MA,...
The Bias Reflection Guide is a tool developed by the PREreview team for anyone who is reviewing a re...
Like many institutions, our University is committed to utilizing the assessment cycle in order to ma...
In performance evaluation, the self-assessment ability is crucial for students' effective learning. ...
Students who are solving open-ended problems would benefit from formative assessment, i.e., from rec...
This research paper designs to show the quintessential importance of the rubrics in evaluation of th...
Open peer review is a process by which to assess publications. Open peer review is a growing method ...
Background: Conducting grading of systematic reviews in master's level programs of health sciences e...
Background: Conducting grading of systematic reviews in master's level programs of health sciences e...
The assessment of a student’s learning outcome in a particular course is aimed not only to evaluate ...
This free 2-hour workshop is a condensed version of the PREreview Open Reviewers Program designed to...
BACKGROUND: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
Background: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
[EN] In the recent context of student-centered learning, they are more involved in the whole learni...
The Reviewer Guide is meant for anyone who is reviewing a research manuscript. It provides a compreh...
Disclosures: This rubric was created collaboratively by undergraduates at Mount Holyoke College (MA,...
The Bias Reflection Guide is a tool developed by the PREreview team for anyone who is reviewing a re...
Like many institutions, our University is committed to utilizing the assessment cycle in order to ma...
In performance evaluation, the self-assessment ability is crucial for students' effective learning. ...
Students who are solving open-ended problems would benefit from formative assessment, i.e., from rec...
This research paper designs to show the quintessential importance of the rubrics in evaluation of th...
Open peer review is a process by which to assess publications. Open peer review is a growing method ...
Background: Conducting grading of systematic reviews in master's level programs of health sciences e...
Background: Conducting grading of systematic reviews in master's level programs of health sciences e...
The assessment of a student’s learning outcome in a particular course is aimed not only to evaluate ...
This free 2-hour workshop is a condensed version of the PREreview Open Reviewers Program designed to...
BACKGROUND: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
Background: Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. With the advent of digitisation, ...
[EN] In the recent context of student-centered learning, they are more involved in the whole learni...