Journal practices (other than OA) promoting Open Science goals

Poster presented at meeting "Editorial boards and the transition to full open access" - Utrecht University, October 25 2019 shared in various formats (png, pdf, pptx, odp) for (re)use and modification Journal practices (other than OA) promoting Open Science goals (relevance, reproducibility, efficiency, transparency) Early, full and reproducible content preregistration – use preregistrations in the review process registered reports – apply peer review to preregistration prior to the study and publish results regardless of outcomes preprint policy – liberally allow preprinting in any archive without license restrictions data/code availability – foster or require open availability of data and code for reviewers and readers TDM allowance – allow unrestricted TDM of full text and metadata for any use null/negative results – publish regardless of outcome Machine readable ecosystem data/code citation – promote citation and use standards persistent IDs – e.g. DOI, ORCID, ROR, Open Funder Registry, grant IDs licenses (in Crossref) – register (open) licenses in Crossref contributorship roles – credit all contributors for their part in the work open citations – make citation information openly available via Crossref Peer review open peer review – e.g. open reports and open identities peer review criteria – evaluate methodological rigour and reporting quality only or also judge expected relevance or impact? rejection rates – publish rejection rates and reconsider high selectivity post-publication peer review – publish immediately after sanity check and let peer review follow that? Diversity author diversity – age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour reviewer diversity – age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour editor diversity – age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour Metrics and DORA DORA: journal metrics – refrain from promoting DORA: article metrics – provide a range and use responsibl