Data set of 150 articles published in 2020 three dental journal groups: predatory journals, OA journals and visible journals. All 150 papers were manually reviewed for their data analysis reporting. The checklist developed by Nieminen was used to evaluate the quality of statistical reporting and data presentation (SRDP). The file includes bibliographic details of the articles, and item and the total scores of SRDP evaluation. In addition, the Consort ratings among clinical trials published in the OA journals are included
Objectives Access to full texts of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) is often limited, so...
OBJECTIVE: To assess 1) the quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental (RCT-Ds) and m...
Reporting guidelines assist basic scientists, translational healthcare researchers and clinicians to...
Abstract: Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliab...
Abstract Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliab...
Funding Information: support from the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programm...
OBJECTIVES A widespread assessment of the reporting of RCT abstracts published in dental journals...
The objective of this article was to record reporting characteristics related to study quality of re...
Aim: To assess the quality report of published research between 2002-2012 in Chilean dental journal...
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of full-text article...
A descriptive survey was performed in order to assess the statistical content and quality of Brazili...
Introduction: Open access publishing is becoming increasingly popular within the biomedical sciences...
A descriptive survey was performed in order to assess the statistical content and quality of Brazili...
BACKGROUND Abstracts of scientific articles should be accurate and detailed in summarizing the in...
To explore the quality of reporting (writing and graphics) of articles that used time-to-event analy...
Objectives Access to full texts of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) is often limited, so...
OBJECTIVE: To assess 1) the quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental (RCT-Ds) and m...
Reporting guidelines assist basic scientists, translational healthcare researchers and clinicians to...
Abstract: Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliab...
Abstract Proper peer review and quality of published articles are often regarded as signs of reliab...
Funding Information: support from the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programm...
OBJECTIVES A widespread assessment of the reporting of RCT abstracts published in dental journals...
The objective of this article was to record reporting characteristics related to study quality of re...
Aim: To assess the quality report of published research between 2002-2012 in Chilean dental journal...
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of full-text article...
A descriptive survey was performed in order to assess the statistical content and quality of Brazili...
Introduction: Open access publishing is becoming increasingly popular within the biomedical sciences...
A descriptive survey was performed in order to assess the statistical content and quality of Brazili...
BACKGROUND Abstracts of scientific articles should be accurate and detailed in summarizing the in...
To explore the quality of reporting (writing and graphics) of articles that used time-to-event analy...
Objectives Access to full texts of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) is often limited, so...
OBJECTIVE: To assess 1) the quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental (RCT-Ds) and m...
Reporting guidelines assist basic scientists, translational healthcare researchers and clinicians to...