FIGURE 1. Morphology of Cothurnia salina n. sp. and similar species (F–I after Kahl, 1933; J, K after Kahl, 1935; L after Küsters, 1974). A. A typical individual. B. Formation of a telotroch after binary fission. C, D. Varieties of body shape. E. Oral infraciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane. F. Cothurnia cyclopis Kahl, 1933. G. Cothurnia ceramicola Kahl, 1933. H. Cothurnia fibripes Kahl, 1933. I. Cothurnia simplex Kahl, 1933. J. Vaginicola sp. Kahl, 1935. K. Cothurnia sp. Kahl, 1935. L. Cothurnia ceramicola sensu Küsters, 1974. G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P1–3, infundibular polykineties 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 40µm.Published as part of Zhuang, Yuan, Clamp, John C., Yi, Zhenzhen & Ji, Daode, 2016, A new Peritrich...
Figure 4. Early to middle morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation....
FIGURE 3. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (A, B, F, G, H) and...
Figure 6. Middle to late morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation. ...
FIGURE 2. Photomicrographs of Cothurnia salina n. sp. from life (A–E) and after staining with protar...
Figure 1. Parallelostrombidium paralatum nov. sp. from life (A, B, E–G) and after protargol impregna...
FIGURE 2. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from life (A, B, F, G, I) and after staining with silver ca...
FIGURE 5. Comparison of some closely related morphotypes. (A, B) Zoothamnium chlamydis (from Hu & So...
FIGURE 1. Line drawings of Cyrtohymena seorakensis sp. n. from life (A–C) and after protargol impreg...
FIGURE 1. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from life (A, B, C, E) and after staining with silver carbo...
Figures 19–26. Morphology of Zoothamnium hiketes from life (19–23), after protargol (24, 25) and sil...
Figure 3. Heterodeviata sinica from life (A, D–F, I–K) and asser protargol impregnation (B, C, G, H,...
FIGURE 1. Morphology and infraciliature of Pinacocoleps tesselatus (Kahl, 1930) Foissner et al. 2008...
Figures 27–38. Photomicrographs of Zoothamnium hiketes from life (27–31), after protargol (32–34, 36...
FIGURES 1 – 7. Pseudepistylis songi n. sp. in vivo (1 – 4, 6), protargol impregnation (7), silver ni...
FIGURE 1. Brooklynella sinensis n. sp. (A–H) and B. hostilis (I, from Lom & Nigrelli, 1970) from liv...
Figure 4. Early to middle morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation....
FIGURE 3. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (A, B, F, G, H) and...
Figure 6. Middle to late morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation. ...
FIGURE 2. Photomicrographs of Cothurnia salina n. sp. from life (A–E) and after staining with protar...
Figure 1. Parallelostrombidium paralatum nov. sp. from life (A, B, E–G) and after protargol impregna...
FIGURE 2. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from life (A, B, F, G, I) and after staining with silver ca...
FIGURE 5. Comparison of some closely related morphotypes. (A, B) Zoothamnium chlamydis (from Hu & So...
FIGURE 1. Line drawings of Cyrtohymena seorakensis sp. n. from life (A–C) and after protargol impreg...
FIGURE 1. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from life (A, B, C, E) and after staining with silver carbo...
Figures 19–26. Morphology of Zoothamnium hiketes from life (19–23), after protargol (24, 25) and sil...
Figure 3. Heterodeviata sinica from life (A, D–F, I–K) and asser protargol impregnation (B, C, G, H,...
FIGURE 1. Morphology and infraciliature of Pinacocoleps tesselatus (Kahl, 1930) Foissner et al. 2008...
Figures 27–38. Photomicrographs of Zoothamnium hiketes from life (27–31), after protargol (32–34, 36...
FIGURES 1 – 7. Pseudepistylis songi n. sp. in vivo (1 – 4, 6), protargol impregnation (7), silver ni...
FIGURE 1. Brooklynella sinensis n. sp. (A–H) and B. hostilis (I, from Lom & Nigrelli, 1970) from liv...
Figure 4. Early to middle morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation....
FIGURE 3. Frontonia paramagna spec. nov. from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (A, B, F, G, H) and...
Figure 6. Middle to late morphogenetic stages of Heterodeviata sinica asser protargol impregnation. ...