FIGURE 3. Scanning electron micographs illustrating the arrangement of the primary dermal papillae. a, P. overbergiensis sp. nov., widely spaced primary dermal papillae with two intermittent accessory papillae, b, P. lawrencei sp. nov., moderately spaced primary dermal papillae with 2–3 intermittent accessory papillae, c, P. c a p e n s i s, densely spaced primary dermal papillae with 3–5 intermittent accessory papillae.Published as part of E, Dane, Ruhberg, Hilke & Daniels, Savel R., 2012, Two new Peripatopsis species (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae) from the Western Cape province, South Africa, pp. 55-68 in Zootaxa 3380 on page 61, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21146
FIGURE 3. Variation in the perineal-pattern morphology within and among different mature females of ...
FIGURE 3. Proteacoccus proteae (Brain). Adult female. Modified after De Lotto (1959).Published as pa...
FIGURE 3. Fistulococcus pokfulamensis. Secondinstar female nymph. For lettering, see Fig. 1 but whe...
FIGURE 4. Scanning electron micographs illustrating morphological variation in the primary dermal pa...
FIGURE 2. Scanning electron micographs illustrating the dorsal foot surface with ridges in: a, P. la...
FIGURE 5. Scanning electron micographs illustrating morphological variation in the genital area. a, ...
FIGURES 28–36. Comparison of dermal papillae between Macroperipatus torquatus, and Epiperipatus acac...
FIGURE 1. Bayesian inference topology for the combined DNA analyses (COI + 18S rRNA) amongst 21 Peri...
FIGURES 2–7. Epiperipatus acacioi comb. nov. 2. Dorsal colour pattern (photo: Ubirajara de Oliveira)...
Figure 3 - Overview map withlocalities of onychophoran species regarded as nomina dubia in the prese...
FIGURE 3. Globoppia vernoncrookensis sp. nov. A. Leg I, left, antiaxial view; B. leg II, right, anti...
FIGURE 3. Distribution of the three major Epiperipatus clades (numbered I–III and enclosed by dotted...
FIGURE 3. A–C. Celleporella hyalina SAMC-A094510. A. General view of the colony. B. Single ovicelled...
FIGURE 3. Haplomacrobiotus utahensis sp. n. A, buccopharyngeal apparatus of a paratype; the figure ...
FIGURE 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Watersipora subtorquata from (A–C) St Peter Port, Guernse...
FIGURE 3. Variation in the perineal-pattern morphology within and among different mature females of ...
FIGURE 3. Proteacoccus proteae (Brain). Adult female. Modified after De Lotto (1959).Published as pa...
FIGURE 3. Fistulococcus pokfulamensis. Secondinstar female nymph. For lettering, see Fig. 1 but whe...
FIGURE 4. Scanning electron micographs illustrating morphological variation in the primary dermal pa...
FIGURE 2. Scanning electron micographs illustrating the dorsal foot surface with ridges in: a, P. la...
FIGURE 5. Scanning electron micographs illustrating morphological variation in the genital area. a, ...
FIGURES 28–36. Comparison of dermal papillae between Macroperipatus torquatus, and Epiperipatus acac...
FIGURE 1. Bayesian inference topology for the combined DNA analyses (COI + 18S rRNA) amongst 21 Peri...
FIGURES 2–7. Epiperipatus acacioi comb. nov. 2. Dorsal colour pattern (photo: Ubirajara de Oliveira)...
Figure 3 - Overview map withlocalities of onychophoran species regarded as nomina dubia in the prese...
FIGURE 3. Globoppia vernoncrookensis sp. nov. A. Leg I, left, antiaxial view; B. leg II, right, anti...
FIGURE 3. Distribution of the three major Epiperipatus clades (numbered I–III and enclosed by dotted...
FIGURE 3. A–C. Celleporella hyalina SAMC-A094510. A. General view of the colony. B. Single ovicelled...
FIGURE 3. Haplomacrobiotus utahensis sp. n. A, buccopharyngeal apparatus of a paratype; the figure ...
FIGURE 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Watersipora subtorquata from (A–C) St Peter Port, Guernse...
FIGURE 3. Variation in the perineal-pattern morphology within and among different mature females of ...
FIGURE 3. Proteacoccus proteae (Brain). Adult female. Modified after De Lotto (1959).Published as pa...
FIGURE 3. Fistulococcus pokfulamensis. Secondinstar female nymph. For lettering, see Fig. 1 but whe...