This document presents the CURE demonstration and evaluation methodology. The deliverable based on Task 5.1. provides planning for the demonstration workshops as well as establishing a primary set of criteria based on the user requirements from the Deliverable D1.1, as well as criteria related to usability and effectiveness characteristics of ISO 25010. These criteria are derived by adapting the Criteria, Indicators and Metrics (CIM) methodology. This document provides the basis to carry out Task 5.2 and Task 5.3
The present document is a deliverable of the SatisFactory project, funded by the European Commission...
De D3.3 Infochart describing the CHIs DSM readiness Assessment Methodology gathers the infographics ...
wrigley2010aThis deliverable is concerned with the implementation of the evaluation campaign based u...
This document presents the users’ feedback from the 1st CURE Demonstration Workshop held on Friday 1...
This document provides a review of current methodologies, which can be of use in the implementation ...
The aim of this deliverable is to access the CURE services against its real impact for the stakehold...
This deliverable details the evaluation methodology of the MITIGATE project. It is produced based on...
This document aims to transform the user requirements as well as requirements derived from App devel...
D5.2.1 will deal first with the analysis of the scenarios defined by WP2 in order to define the demo...
Deliverable 2.3 (D2.3) is the main outcome of Task 2.3 (T2.3) of the RESPOND-A project [1]. The main...
This document provides an overview of the published material of the CURE project (Copernicus for Urb...
This document describes the architectural design of the CURE Prototype in detail based on the usage ...
This document accompanies the Deliverable D4.5 – the CURE Portal – a final delivery of activities in...
This document defines for each iteration the evaluation methodology to be followed, based on the req...
This document presents CURE stakeholder needs and requirements to shape the development of CURE cros...
The present document is a deliverable of the SatisFactory project, funded by the European Commission...
De D3.3 Infochart describing the CHIs DSM readiness Assessment Methodology gathers the infographics ...
wrigley2010aThis deliverable is concerned with the implementation of the evaluation campaign based u...
This document presents the users’ feedback from the 1st CURE Demonstration Workshop held on Friday 1...
This document provides a review of current methodologies, which can be of use in the implementation ...
The aim of this deliverable is to access the CURE services against its real impact for the stakehold...
This deliverable details the evaluation methodology of the MITIGATE project. It is produced based on...
This document aims to transform the user requirements as well as requirements derived from App devel...
D5.2.1 will deal first with the analysis of the scenarios defined by WP2 in order to define the demo...
Deliverable 2.3 (D2.3) is the main outcome of Task 2.3 (T2.3) of the RESPOND-A project [1]. The main...
This document provides an overview of the published material of the CURE project (Copernicus for Urb...
This document describes the architectural design of the CURE Prototype in detail based on the usage ...
This document accompanies the Deliverable D4.5 – the CURE Portal – a final delivery of activities in...
This document defines for each iteration the evaluation methodology to be followed, based on the req...
This document presents CURE stakeholder needs and requirements to shape the development of CURE cros...
The present document is a deliverable of the SatisFactory project, funded by the European Commission...
De D3.3 Infochart describing the CHIs DSM readiness Assessment Methodology gathers the infographics ...
wrigley2010aThis deliverable is concerned with the implementation of the evaluation campaign based u...