Abstract: If God commanded something that was obviously evil, would we have a moral obligation to do it? I critically examine three radically different approaches divine-command theorists may take to the problem posed by this question: (l) reject the possibility of such a command by appealing to God's essential goodness; (2) avoid the implication that we should obey such a command by modifying the divine-command theory; and (3) accept the implication that we should obey such a command by appealing to divine transcendence and mystery. I show that each approach faces significant challenges, and that none is completely satisfying
Let us suppose that God commands all and only those actions that are obligatory, and prohibits all a...
Twentieth-century analytic philosophy ushered in a renewed interest in an ethical theory known as th...
Mark Murphy argues that the property identity version of divine command theory, coupled with the doc...
Assuming divine command theory is true, there are no moral limits on the commands God can issue. Nev...
How can we make sense of God’s moral goodness if God cannot be subject to moral obligations? This qu...
Is there a connection between religion and morality? Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Ka...
Recent defenders of the divine command theory like Adams and Alston have confronted the Euthyphro di...
I reply to criticisms of the divine command theory with an eye to noting the relation of ethics to a...
Philosophical approaches to ancient Israelite religion are rare, as is metaethical reflection on th...
This paper considers Stephen Darwall’s recent attempt to overturn Elizabeth Anscombe’s claim that mo...
Divine command theories of metaethics are commonly rejected on the basis of the Euthyphro problem. I...
I argue that there are persistent problems in contemporary modifications of divine command theory. D...
Este artículo discute cuáles son las razones decisivas para actuar de acuerdo con los comandos divin...
Divine law theories of metaethics claim that moral rightness is grounded in God’s commands, wishes a...
Horrendous evils pose distinctive challenges for belief in an ethically perfect God. To home in on t...
Let us suppose that God commands all and only those actions that are obligatory, and prohibits all a...
Twentieth-century analytic philosophy ushered in a renewed interest in an ethical theory known as th...
Mark Murphy argues that the property identity version of divine command theory, coupled with the doc...
Assuming divine command theory is true, there are no moral limits on the commands God can issue. Nev...
How can we make sense of God’s moral goodness if God cannot be subject to moral obligations? This qu...
Is there a connection between religion and morality? Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Ka...
Recent defenders of the divine command theory like Adams and Alston have confronted the Euthyphro di...
I reply to criticisms of the divine command theory with an eye to noting the relation of ethics to a...
Philosophical approaches to ancient Israelite religion are rare, as is metaethical reflection on th...
This paper considers Stephen Darwall’s recent attempt to overturn Elizabeth Anscombe’s claim that mo...
Divine command theories of metaethics are commonly rejected on the basis of the Euthyphro problem. I...
I argue that there are persistent problems in contemporary modifications of divine command theory. D...
Este artículo discute cuáles son las razones decisivas para actuar de acuerdo con los comandos divin...
Divine law theories of metaethics claim that moral rightness is grounded in God’s commands, wishes a...
Horrendous evils pose distinctive challenges for belief in an ethically perfect God. To home in on t...
Let us suppose that God commands all and only those actions that are obligatory, and prohibits all a...
Twentieth-century analytic philosophy ushered in a renewed interest in an ethical theory known as th...
Mark Murphy argues that the property identity version of divine command theory, coupled with the doc...