How might we link interpretation and causal inference? Our symposium contributors all agree that interpretivist and cau-sality-oriented approaches can be selectively and productively combined. Yet if we are generally bullish on these prospects, our optimism is built on a strong desire to steer clear of what we see in many quarters—namely, the deep subordination of interpretivist approaches to causality-oriented ones. We do not view interpretive methods as the “summer intern” to the supposedly more serious work performed by non-interpretivist tools of inquiry
This paper provides a simplified method for evaluating the evidence in favour of a causal claim. It ...
There is a need for integrated thinking about causality, probability and mechanisms in scientific me...
Theories of causation in philosophy ask what makes causal claims true and establish so called truth ...
How do our interpretations link up to our causal claims? How does attention to causality refine our ...
In this issue, we are delighted to present a symposium, inspired by a panel at the 2015 APSA Annual ...
How are we to understand causal relations and analysis in social science? This paper takes R. G. Col...
The rapidly expanding discipline of interpretive inquiry, especially in its narrative analysis form,...
NoCausal inference is perhaps the most important form of reasoning in the sciences. A panoply of dis...
Establishing causality has been a problem throughout history of philosophy of science. This paper di...
We argue that a modified version of Mill’s method of agreement can strongly confirm causal generaliz...
Perhaps the key philosophical questions concerning causality are the follow-ing: • what are causal r...
Theories of causation in philosophy ask what makes causal claims true and establish the so-called tr...
In this essay a dialogue is established between the main epistemological theories about causality th...
Professor Dawid has presented a thought-provoking analysis of causal infer-ence, and has certainly c...
Qualitative methodologists generally treat process tracing methods and a mechanistic view of causati...
This paper provides a simplified method for evaluating the evidence in favour of a causal claim. It ...
There is a need for integrated thinking about causality, probability and mechanisms in scientific me...
Theories of causation in philosophy ask what makes causal claims true and establish so called truth ...
How do our interpretations link up to our causal claims? How does attention to causality refine our ...
In this issue, we are delighted to present a symposium, inspired by a panel at the 2015 APSA Annual ...
How are we to understand causal relations and analysis in social science? This paper takes R. G. Col...
The rapidly expanding discipline of interpretive inquiry, especially in its narrative analysis form,...
NoCausal inference is perhaps the most important form of reasoning in the sciences. A panoply of dis...
Establishing causality has been a problem throughout history of philosophy of science. This paper di...
We argue that a modified version of Mill’s method of agreement can strongly confirm causal generaliz...
Perhaps the key philosophical questions concerning causality are the follow-ing: • what are causal r...
Theories of causation in philosophy ask what makes causal claims true and establish the so-called tr...
In this essay a dialogue is established between the main epistemological theories about causality th...
Professor Dawid has presented a thought-provoking analysis of causal infer-ence, and has certainly c...
Qualitative methodologists generally treat process tracing methods and a mechanistic view of causati...
This paper provides a simplified method for evaluating the evidence in favour of a causal claim. It ...
There is a need for integrated thinking about causality, probability and mechanisms in scientific me...
Theories of causation in philosophy ask what makes causal claims true and establish so called truth ...