Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl.

Erysimum laciniatum Boiss., Diagn. Pl. Orient. 1: 71. 1843. Type: “[Boissier] Hab. in regione alpinâ montium Lydiae et Cariae ad umbram Juniperorum, Mesogis, Cadmus, Tmolus. Floret Junio ”. Lectotypus (first step designated by POLATSCHEK, 2011: 401; second step designated here): TURKEY: “In dumosis Cadmi ad orientum Denislah”, VI.1842, Boissier s.n. (G-BOIS [G00332155]; isolecto-: C [C10008844], GH [GH00055746], GOET [GOET002595], K [K000075607, K000075608], NY [NY00689139, NY00689140]). Syntypi: TURKEY: “Tmolus supra Bozdagh ad rivus Lydia”, VII.1842, Boissier s.n. (G-BOIS [G00332157]); “Tmolus”, s.d., Boissier s.n. (G-BOIS [G00332153]); “ Caria ”, 1843, Pinard s.n. (W [W0026657]). = Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. Nov.: 10. 1842. Notes. – POLATSCHEK (2011) erroneously lectotypified the name on the unicate W0026657, which was not annotated by Boissier, and attributed its collection to Boissier instead of Pinard. The duplicates in C, GH, GOET, and NY that he cited were Boissier’s collections listed above as isolectotypes. BOISSIER (1843) based his species description almost exclusively on his own collections in G-BOIS that Polatschek did not examine or cite. Therefore, a second step is necessary to designate the lectotype in G-BOIS. The lectotype has only the month and not the year, but all the isolectotypes have “Tmolus et Cadmus. VI. 1842 ” indicated. Erysimum pulchellum var. microphyllum Boiss., Fl. Orient. 1: 207. 1867. Cheiranthus rupestris Sm. in Sibth., Fl. Graec. Prodr. 2: 23. 1813. = Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. Nov.: 10. 1842. Note. – This is a renaming at the varietal rank of Cheiranthus rupestris (holotype: Sibthorp s.n., probably at OXF). Erysimum pulchellum var. calvertii (Boiss. & A. Huet) Boiss., Fl. Orient. 1: 207. 1867. Erysimum rupestre var. calvertii Boiss. & A. Huet in Boiss., Diagn. Pl. Orient. ser. 2, 5: 22. 1856. Type: “Hab. in Armeniâ propè Messiré in valle Kassuklu cl. Huet, in monte Techdagh cl. Calvert”. Lectotypus (designated here): TURKEY: “Tech Dagh”, 1853, Calvert 38 (G-BOIS [G00332160]). Syntypi: TURKEY: “In valle Kassuklu. Inter Baibout et Erzeroum”, V.1853, Huet du Pavilion s.n. (G [G00446068], K [K000075603, K000075605], W [W18890010515]); “Ad viam propè Messiré. Inter Trapezuntem et Baibout”, V.1853, Huet du Pavilion s.n. (GOET, K [K000075602, K000075606], W). = Erysimum pulchellum (Willd.) J. Gay, Erysim. Nov.: 10. 1842. Note. – POLATSCHEK (2011) did not typify the variety, though he cited the syntypes under E. pulchellum.Published as part of AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle, 2019, Typification of Edmond Boissier's Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) names enumerated in Flora Orientalis, pp. 1-193 in Boissiera 72 on page 44, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.763043