Open letter to the Society for Neuroscience
- McKiernan, Erin C.
- Herrera-Valdez, Marco Arieli
- Madan, Christopher R.
- Desjardins-Proulx, Philippe
- Eklund, Anders
- Kubke, M. Fabiana
- Holcombe, Alex O.
- Steel, Graham
- Marrone, Diano F.
- Oppenheim, Charles
- Faulkes, Zen
- Tennant, Jonathan P.
- Gardner, Nicholas M.
- Thirumalai, Avinash
- Park, Travis
- Meghreblian, Ben
- Kaplan, Sean
- Chambers, Chris
- Nicholson, Joshua M.
- Velterop, Jan
- Poisot, Timothee
- Anquetin, Jérémy
- Allen, Liz Allen
- Björk, Johannes
- Mounce, Ross
- Edmunds, Scott
- Cruz-Aponte, Maytée
- Hancock, Joseph R.
- Fatima, Nazeefa
- Pant Pai, Nitika
- Silva, Elizabeth
- Brembs, Björn
- Ridgway, Gerard
- Gatti-Lafranconi, Pietro
- Chen, Xianwen
- Dávila, Jacinto
- de Bivort, Benjamin
- Beckett, Stephen
- Menon, Mythili
- Choraziak, Adam
- Triggs, Graham
- Dumas, Guillaume
- Hollister, Jeffrey W.
- Gruson-Daniel, Célya
- McDowell, Gary S.
- Klein, Pierre-Alexandre
- Laroche, Julien
- Thome, Alex
- Guyon, Nicolas
- Fausto, Sibele
- Finlayson, Nonie
- Singh Chawla, Dalmeet
- Wilbanks, John
- Carroll, David
- Martínez-Molina, Noelia
- Sloan, Maximilian
- Eglen, Stephen
DOIAbstract
This is an open letter concerning the recent launch of the new open access journal, eNeuro. We welcome the diversification of journal choices for authors looking for open access venues, as well as the willingness of eNeuro to accept negative results and study replications, its membership in the Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium, the publication of peer review syntheses alongside articles, and the requirement that molecular data be publicly available. As strong supporters of open access, we welcome the commitment of the Society to making the works it publishes freely and openly available. However, we are concerned with several aspects of the specific approach, and outline herein a number of suggestions that would allow eNeuro to provide ...
Add to ORKG