Just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction refers to the technique of predicting whether a code change is defective. Many contributions have been made in this area through the excellent dataset by Kamei. In this paper, we revisit the dataset and highlight preprocessing difficulties with the dataset and the limitations of the dataset on unsupervised learning. Secondly, we propose certain features in the Kamei dataset that can be used for training models. Lastly, we discuss the limitations of the dataset’s features
ContextDefect prediction can help at prioritizing testing tasks by, for instance, ranking a list of ...
This dataset contains all data collected to conduct the studies in Chapter 3 "Fine-Grained Just-In-T...
Defect prediction models focus on identifying defect-prone code elements, for example to allow pract...
Just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction refers to the technique of predicting whether a code change is ...
Previous researchers conducting Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction tasks have primarily focused on...
Just-in-time software defect prediction (JIT-SDP) is an active topic in software defect prediction, ...
Finding defects in proposed changes is one of the biggest motivations and expected outcomes of code ...
We have meticulously prepared this comprehensive replication package to facilitate further investiga...
Some of the challenges faced with Just-in-time defect (JIT) prediction are achieving high performing...
Since the introduction of Just-in-Time effort aware defect prediction, many researchers are focusing...
This dataset was created using the downloadable defect tickets from the Trac website and also the so...
Effort-aware just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction is to rank source code changes based on the likeli...
Abstract—Defect prediction is a very meaningful topic, par-ticularly at change-level. Change-level d...
Developers use defect prediction models to efficiently allocate limited resources for quality assura...
Software quality assurance efforts often focus on identifying defective code. To find likely defecti...
ContextDefect prediction can help at prioritizing testing tasks by, for instance, ranking a list of ...
This dataset contains all data collected to conduct the studies in Chapter 3 "Fine-Grained Just-In-T...
Defect prediction models focus on identifying defect-prone code elements, for example to allow pract...
Just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction refers to the technique of predicting whether a code change is ...
Previous researchers conducting Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction tasks have primarily focused on...
Just-in-time software defect prediction (JIT-SDP) is an active topic in software defect prediction, ...
Finding defects in proposed changes is one of the biggest motivations and expected outcomes of code ...
We have meticulously prepared this comprehensive replication package to facilitate further investiga...
Some of the challenges faced with Just-in-time defect (JIT) prediction are achieving high performing...
Since the introduction of Just-in-Time effort aware defect prediction, many researchers are focusing...
This dataset was created using the downloadable defect tickets from the Trac website and also the so...
Effort-aware just-in-time (JIT) defect prediction is to rank source code changes based on the likeli...
Abstract—Defect prediction is a very meaningful topic, par-ticularly at change-level. Change-level d...
Developers use defect prediction models to efficiently allocate limited resources for quality assura...
Software quality assurance efforts often focus on identifying defective code. To find likely defecti...
ContextDefect prediction can help at prioritizing testing tasks by, for instance, ranking a list of ...
This dataset contains all data collected to conduct the studies in Chapter 3 "Fine-Grained Just-In-T...
Defect prediction models focus on identifying defect-prone code elements, for example to allow pract...