While automated speaker recognition by machines can be quite good as seen in NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluations, performance can still suffer when the environmental conditions, emotions, or recording quality changes. This research examines how robust humans are compared to machine recognition for changing environments. Several data conditions including short sentences, frequency selective noise, and time-reversed speech are used to test the robustness of both humans and machine algorithms. Statistical significance tests were completed and, for most conditions, human were more robust
International audienceAs human listeners, it seems that we should be experts in processing vocal sou...
The 2010 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE10) included a test of Human Assisted Speaker Recog...
Speaker recognition is a technique of identifying the person talking to a machine using the voice fe...
The performance of automatic speech recognition systems is usually assessed in terms of error rate. ...
An individual's voice can vary dramatically depending on word choice, affect, and other factors. Suc...
Speech is the most natural way of communication for human being, thus, techniques to communicate wit...
This paper focuses on resolving a number of issues that ap-pear when the performance of human speech...
The central issues in the study of speech recognition by human listeners (HSR) and of automatic spee...
"Hackers" have written malicious programs to exploit online services intended for human users. As a ...
A procedure for comparing the performance of humans and machines on speaker recognition and on foren...
Research was conducted to determine if a relation exists between human exertion and the ability of s...
We compare automatic recognition with human perception of audio-visual speech, in the large-vocabula...
International audienceWhen we observe a producible human movement, the brain performs a specific per...
Present-day speech technology systems try to perform equally well or preferably even better than hum...
The purpose with this final master degree project was to develop a speech recognition tool, to make ...
International audienceAs human listeners, it seems that we should be experts in processing vocal sou...
The 2010 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE10) included a test of Human Assisted Speaker Recog...
Speaker recognition is a technique of identifying the person talking to a machine using the voice fe...
The performance of automatic speech recognition systems is usually assessed in terms of error rate. ...
An individual's voice can vary dramatically depending on word choice, affect, and other factors. Suc...
Speech is the most natural way of communication for human being, thus, techniques to communicate wit...
This paper focuses on resolving a number of issues that ap-pear when the performance of human speech...
The central issues in the study of speech recognition by human listeners (HSR) and of automatic spee...
"Hackers" have written malicious programs to exploit online services intended for human users. As a ...
A procedure for comparing the performance of humans and machines on speaker recognition and on foren...
Research was conducted to determine if a relation exists between human exertion and the ability of s...
We compare automatic recognition with human perception of audio-visual speech, in the large-vocabula...
International audienceWhen we observe a producible human movement, the brain performs a specific per...
Present-day speech technology systems try to perform equally well or preferably even better than hum...
The purpose with this final master degree project was to develop a speech recognition tool, to make ...
International audienceAs human listeners, it seems that we should be experts in processing vocal sou...
The 2010 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE10) included a test of Human Assisted Speaker Recog...
Speaker recognition is a technique of identifying the person talking to a machine using the voice fe...