Fig. 12. Experiment 4, PCA of B1, B7, B8, N1, N7, N11, and C1 run on a chiral column (standardized TIC responses). Largest circles show 95% confidence limits for each tree species, small circles show 95% confidence limits for each tree.Published as part of Raber, Alexandra G., Peachey-Stoner, Reuben J., Cessna, Stephen G. & Siderhurst, Matthew S., 2021, Headspace GC-MS analysis of differences in intra- and interspecific Terpene profiles of Picea pungens Engelm. and P. abies (L.) Karst, pp. 1-13 in Phytochemistry (112541) 181 on page 11, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112541, http://zenodo.org/record/829127
Fig. 4. Observed key HMBC correlations of 1–7.Published as part of Jiang, Wei, Xiong, Juan, Zang, Yi...
Fig. 2. Changes in the profile of volatiles released by Pinus pinaster trees being fed on by Monocha...
The extractable monoterpenes from needles of two groups of trees - 4-year-old clonal and 20-year-old...
Fig. 8. Experiment 2, PCA of B1–B11, N1–N11, and C1 run over two days (standardized TIC responses). ...
Fig. 10. Experiment 3, PCA of B1–B11 and N1–N11 run over two days (standardized TIC responses). Circ...
Fig. 5. Experiment 1, PCA of B1, N1, and C1 over time (standardized TIC responses). Samples were col...
Fig. 11. Experiment 3, mean GC/MS peak area (±SE) of branches, buds, and needles in blue and Norway ...
Fig. 6. Selected principal component loadings vs. GC retention times. Loadings are shown for Experim...
Fig. 9. Experiment 2, comparison of N1, N7, and N11 GC traces (standardized TIC responses). Differen...
Raber, Alexandra G., Peachey-Stoner, Reuben J., Cessna, Stephen G., Siderhurst, Matthew S. (2021): H...
Fig. 4. Sample chiral GC traces of blue spruce (B1), Norway spruce (N1), and cedar of Lebanon (C1). ...
Fig. 7. Experiment 1, comparison of variation in cedar of Lebanon samples. Different colored sample ...
Fig. 3. Sample GC traces of blue spruce (B1), Norway spruce (N1), and cedar of Lebanon (C1). Compoun...
Fig. 2. Chemical structures for terpenes detected from branch tip samples. Numbering follows Table 1...
Fig. 1. Mean abundance of Norway volatiles vs time (left) and the logarithm of average abundance of ...
Fig. 4. Observed key HMBC correlations of 1–7.Published as part of Jiang, Wei, Xiong, Juan, Zang, Yi...
Fig. 2. Changes in the profile of volatiles released by Pinus pinaster trees being fed on by Monocha...
The extractable monoterpenes from needles of two groups of trees - 4-year-old clonal and 20-year-old...
Fig. 8. Experiment 2, PCA of B1–B11, N1–N11, and C1 run over two days (standardized TIC responses). ...
Fig. 10. Experiment 3, PCA of B1–B11 and N1–N11 run over two days (standardized TIC responses). Circ...
Fig. 5. Experiment 1, PCA of B1, N1, and C1 over time (standardized TIC responses). Samples were col...
Fig. 11. Experiment 3, mean GC/MS peak area (±SE) of branches, buds, and needles in blue and Norway ...
Fig. 6. Selected principal component loadings vs. GC retention times. Loadings are shown for Experim...
Fig. 9. Experiment 2, comparison of N1, N7, and N11 GC traces (standardized TIC responses). Differen...
Raber, Alexandra G., Peachey-Stoner, Reuben J., Cessna, Stephen G., Siderhurst, Matthew S. (2021): H...
Fig. 4. Sample chiral GC traces of blue spruce (B1), Norway spruce (N1), and cedar of Lebanon (C1). ...
Fig. 7. Experiment 1, comparison of variation in cedar of Lebanon samples. Different colored sample ...
Fig. 3. Sample GC traces of blue spruce (B1), Norway spruce (N1), and cedar of Lebanon (C1). Compoun...
Fig. 2. Chemical structures for terpenes detected from branch tip samples. Numbering follows Table 1...
Fig. 1. Mean abundance of Norway volatiles vs time (left) and the logarithm of average abundance of ...
Fig. 4. Observed key HMBC correlations of 1–7.Published as part of Jiang, Wei, Xiong, Juan, Zang, Yi...
Fig. 2. Changes in the profile of volatiles released by Pinus pinaster trees being fed on by Monocha...
The extractable monoterpenes from needles of two groups of trees - 4-year-old clonal and 20-year-old...