Fig. 4 in The metabolic sensitivity of hydrogen isotope fractionation differs between plant compounds

Baan, Jochem
Holloway-Phillips, Meisha
Nelson, Daniel B.
Kahmen, Ansgar

Publication date

March 2023

DOI

Abstract

Fig. 4. Comparison of εbio values among species and mutants between phytol and n-C16:0 (A), and between phytol and cellulose (B). Dashed lines represent significant (p <0.05) correlations, with the black line representing the correlation across all species and genotypes, and the colored lines representing the correlations across genotypes within a species. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)Published as part of Baan, Jochem, Holloway-Phillips, Meisha, Nelson, Daniel B. & Kahmen, Ansgar, 2023, The metabolic sensitivity of hydrogen isotope fractionation differs between plant compounds, pp. 1-11 in Phytochemistry (113563) 207 on page 4, DOI: 10.1016/j...

Extracted data

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Fig. 4 in The metabolic sensitivity of hydrogen isotope fractionation differs between plant compounds

Abstract

Extracted data

Fig. 4 in The metabolic sensitivity of hydrogen isotope fractionation differs between plant compounds

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items