FIGURE 3. (Continued)Published as part of Martin, Nicholas A., 2020, Revision of the whitefly genus, Asterochiton Maskell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from New Zealand, a study of intraspecific variation, pp. 301-341 in Zootaxa 4859 (3) on page 309, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4859.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/441307
FIGURE 3. Map of distribution.Published as part of Korneyev, Severyn V., Hancock, David L., Hauser, ...
FIGURE 3. Adult males of Scorpiurus spp. A, S. aenescens; B, S. thorpei sp. nov.Published as part of...
Figure 3 Variation observed in paranota of paratypes of Minitingisminusculus. Scale bar: 0.25 mm
FIGURE 6. (Continued)Published as part of Martin, Nicholas A., 2020, Revision of the whitefly genus,...
FIGURE 13. (Continued)Published as part of Martin, Nicholas A., 2020, Revision of the whitefly genus...
FIGURE 7. Asterochiton cerata (Maskell, 1896) puparium. A. Dorsum line drawing, B. Dorsum slide moun...
Martin, Nicholas A. (2020): Revision of the whitefly genus, Asterochiton Maskell (Hemiptera: Aleyrod...
FIGURE 6. Asterochiton aureus Maskell, 1879. A. Dorsum line drawing, B. Dorsum slide mount, C. Pupar...
FIGURE 3. Marmasoma sumptuosum White: A–B. Male. A. Lateral habitus; B. Dorsal habitus. C–D. Female....
FIGURE 3. Test of second-instar male (left half only). Kalasiris martini Hodgson & Richmond, spec. n...
Figure 3. Photographs of Halticini genera: Acratheus–Halticus. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male.Pub...
FIGURE 3. Adult habitus photographs of Austrothaumalea, lateral view. A, A. apicalis (♂); B, A. spat...
FIGURES 3–4. General morphology of a whitefly. 3, third-larval instar; 4, fourth-larval instar (pupa...
FIGURE 3. Pseudoscelolabes fulvescens (Miller, 1923) male terminalia. A. Dorsal view; B. Ventral vie...
FIGURE 3. Johnmannia powerae sp. nov. Ψ ANIC29 003454 dorsal, A–E; Ψ ANIC29 003454 frontal, F–G. (A)...
FIGURE 3. Map of distribution.Published as part of Korneyev, Severyn V., Hancock, David L., Hauser, ...
FIGURE 3. Adult males of Scorpiurus spp. A, S. aenescens; B, S. thorpei sp. nov.Published as part of...
Figure 3 Variation observed in paranota of paratypes of Minitingisminusculus. Scale bar: 0.25 mm
FIGURE 6. (Continued)Published as part of Martin, Nicholas A., 2020, Revision of the whitefly genus,...
FIGURE 13. (Continued)Published as part of Martin, Nicholas A., 2020, Revision of the whitefly genus...
FIGURE 7. Asterochiton cerata (Maskell, 1896) puparium. A. Dorsum line drawing, B. Dorsum slide moun...
Martin, Nicholas A. (2020): Revision of the whitefly genus, Asterochiton Maskell (Hemiptera: Aleyrod...
FIGURE 6. Asterochiton aureus Maskell, 1879. A. Dorsum line drawing, B. Dorsum slide mount, C. Pupar...
FIGURE 3. Marmasoma sumptuosum White: A–B. Male. A. Lateral habitus; B. Dorsal habitus. C–D. Female....
FIGURE 3. Test of second-instar male (left half only). Kalasiris martini Hodgson & Richmond, spec. n...
Figure 3. Photographs of Halticini genera: Acratheus–Halticus. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male.Pub...
FIGURE 3. Adult habitus photographs of Austrothaumalea, lateral view. A, A. apicalis (♂); B, A. spat...
FIGURES 3–4. General morphology of a whitefly. 3, third-larval instar; 4, fourth-larval instar (pupa...
FIGURE 3. Pseudoscelolabes fulvescens (Miller, 1923) male terminalia. A. Dorsal view; B. Ventral vie...
FIGURE 3. Johnmannia powerae sp. nov. Ψ ANIC29 003454 dorsal, A–E; Ψ ANIC29 003454 frontal, F–G. (A)...
FIGURE 3. Map of distribution.Published as part of Korneyev, Severyn V., Hancock, David L., Hauser, ...
FIGURE 3. Adult males of Scorpiurus spp. A, S. aenescens; B, S. thorpei sp. nov.Published as part of...
Figure 3 Variation observed in paranota of paratypes of Minitingisminusculus. Scale bar: 0.25 mm