This thesis presents the debate happened during the 1920s between the journalist Walter Lippmann (1889 - 1974) and the philosopher and pedagogist John Dewey (1859 - 1952) around the topics of public opinion and modern democracy. The aim of this study is to interpret the dispute between these two intellectuals based on their assumptions regarding three themes: communication, science and democratic government. We will read the notable works "Public Opinion" (1922), "The Phantom Public" (1925) and "The Public and Its Problems" (1927) to compare their views on the three aforementioned subjects and, in the end, we will try to connect their thoughts and worries with the problems that modern liberal democracies have, dealing with science advanceme...
We propose a reconsideration of John Dewey’s criticisms of Walter Lippmann’s ideas taking as guiding...
Within the debate on the value-free science ideal, the relation between scientific inquiries and cit...
In his Federalist Papers Madison presents a vision of how opinions will be developed into a shared p...
In the early twentieth century, John Dewey and Walter Lippmann engaged in a social and philosophical...
I concetti di 'rappresentanza' e di 'opinione pubblica' furono al centro di un intenso dibattito fra...
The strength and vitality of the debate on deliberative democracy has prompted to look for its possi...
The aim of this article is to present and discuss John Dewey’s and Walter Lippmann’s views on the pr...
Lippmann and Dewey both confronted the problem of how to get the nation’s highly successful science ...
Journalist Walter Lippmann and philosopher John Dewey engaged in an extended dialogue in the 1 920s ...
Democracy is deliberation and discussion: Walter Lippmann and John Dewey gave a formidable illustrat...
Historians often interpret American political thought in the early twentieth century through an oppo...
Dok novinar i društveni teoretičar Walter Lippmann sredinom dvadesetih godina prošlog stoljeća upozo...
This essay addresses the relationship between communication, public opinion, and democracy, which is...
This thesis reassesses the significance of the prominent journalist and political thinker Walter Lip...
International audience"In the abundant literature on Lippmann's neoliberalism in 1937, several studi...
We propose a reconsideration of John Dewey’s criticisms of Walter Lippmann’s ideas taking as guiding...
Within the debate on the value-free science ideal, the relation between scientific inquiries and cit...
In his Federalist Papers Madison presents a vision of how opinions will be developed into a shared p...
In the early twentieth century, John Dewey and Walter Lippmann engaged in a social and philosophical...
I concetti di 'rappresentanza' e di 'opinione pubblica' furono al centro di un intenso dibattito fra...
The strength and vitality of the debate on deliberative democracy has prompted to look for its possi...
The aim of this article is to present and discuss John Dewey’s and Walter Lippmann’s views on the pr...
Lippmann and Dewey both confronted the problem of how to get the nation’s highly successful science ...
Journalist Walter Lippmann and philosopher John Dewey engaged in an extended dialogue in the 1 920s ...
Democracy is deliberation and discussion: Walter Lippmann and John Dewey gave a formidable illustrat...
Historians often interpret American political thought in the early twentieth century through an oppo...
Dok novinar i društveni teoretičar Walter Lippmann sredinom dvadesetih godina prošlog stoljeća upozo...
This essay addresses the relationship between communication, public opinion, and democracy, which is...
This thesis reassesses the significance of the prominent journalist and political thinker Walter Lip...
International audience"In the abundant literature on Lippmann's neoliberalism in 1937, several studi...
We propose a reconsideration of John Dewey’s criticisms of Walter Lippmann’s ideas taking as guiding...
Within the debate on the value-free science ideal, the relation between scientific inquiries and cit...
In his Federalist Papers Madison presents a vision of how opinions will be developed into a shared p...