Geometric Adaptation of Astronomy's Nice Model Applied to Inner Solar System to Reveal Moon's Origin

Astronomy’s Nice model from earlier this century speculates that Jupiter migrated in the early solar system, moving closer to the Sun than its present position then retreating farther away. Similarly, this article hypothesizes that Mercury formed beyond the orbit of Mars because its high potassium/thorium ratio indicates that it formed farther from the Sun, and migrated inwards. The Moon’s potassium level is approximately ten times lower than that of Venus or Earth. Therefore, it would have been closer to the Sun than Mercury is today and much of its potassium would have evaporated into space. A couple of theories regarding lunar origins can be divided into Darwinian fission and Theian fission. * * “Fission” refers to Darwinian fission and the “giant impact” between Theia and Earth refers to a type of fission this article calls Theian fission (both Darwinian and Theian fission involve a "blob"). First, Darwinian fission – the first detailed attempt at investigating where the Moon came from was put forward in 1879 by George Darwin, son of the famous evolutionary naturalist Charles. This says Earth was spinning so rapidly 50 million years ago that centrifugal force caused it to bulge markedly at the equator. The Sun’s gravity then tore away a large blob of the protruding material, and this solidified into the Moon. However, the present-day Earth-Moon system should contain "fossil evidence" of this rapid spin and it does not. Also, this hypothesis does not have a natural explanation for the extra baking the lunar material has received. Like the discredited Darwinian fission, the other "blob theory" - the much more recent Theian fission, or giant-impact hypothesis, which says an ancient Mars-sized planet called Theia collided with the early Earth some 4.5 billion years ago, with the Moon developing from the blob of vapour, melted rock, and debris that resulted - is also discredited because the theory suggests a basic chemical kinship between Earth and its satellite. The Moon’s relative scarcity of volatiles and iron hardly suggests chemical kinship of Earth and Moon (additional info on volatiles, as well as chemical kinship, in next paragraph). ^ ^ Volatiles are chemical elements and chemical compounds that can be readily vaporized. In contrast with volatiles, elements and compounds that are not readily vaporized are known as refractory substances. Volatiles include nitrogen, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen, methane, sulfur dioxide, and water. The Clementine data from the US spacecraft launched to explore the moon in 1994 best fits the capture hypothesis – the potassium model placing the Moon’s origin close to the Sun (Incidentally, this agrees with “… the Moon at its inception was apparently hotter than Earth.” [Moons and Rings. Book in the series “Voyage Through the Universe”. Time-Life Books. Page 37.1991] which agrees with the "extra baking" associated with Darwinian fission) Apart from things like volatiles and iron, the Moon rocks are hauntingly similar to those on Earth. The Earth–Moon system has unique chemical and isotopic signatures compared with other planetary bodies; any successful model for the origin of this system therefore has to satisfy these chemical and isotopic constraints. The similarity of chemical and isotopic signatures within the capture hypothesis can be explained using the below section titled Vector-Tensor-Scalar (VTS) Geometry. This says “… the particles of matter in the protoplanetary disk could imprint themselves on the waves’ interaction and, like the repeating action of refreshing or reloading a computer screen, repeat the action of building up a planet layer by layer in order for two similar planets (the Earth-Moon system) to come into being. The differences in the quantities/distribution of iron, oxygen, water, mass, etc simply means that the building up of two similar planets may be compared to a gravitational/electromagnetic scanner incorporating a subroutine utilizing “fuzzy logic”. * * “Fuzzy logic" is based on the observation that people make decisions based on imprecise and non-numerical information. Fuzzy models or sets are mathematical means of representing vagueness and imprecise information (hence the term fuzzy). These models have the capability of recognising, representing, manipulating, interpreting, and using data and information that are vague and lack certainty. VTS Geometry has the advantage of also providing insights into the production of mass – including the Higgs boson, stellar jets, black holes, the bosons of the strong and weak nuclear forces. There are even insights into dark matter, dark energy, the alleged Big Bang, the static universe, and quaternions