Both Web of Science and Scopus are critical components of the current research ecosystem, providing the basis for university and global rankings as well as for bibliometric research. However, both platforms are structurally biased against research produced in non-Western countries, non-English language research, and research from the arts, humanities, and social sciences. This viewpoint emphasizes the damage that these systematic inequities inflict upon global knowledge production systems and the need for research funders to unite to form a more globally representative, non-profit, community-controlled infrastructure for the global pool of research knowledge
This study uses citations to a group of 42 LIS faculty members to examine the differences between Sc...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, with bibliometrics...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
This study analyses the differences between what the academic communities of a country regard should...
The evaluation of research outputs in the form of journal articles is important to help with monitor...
This investigation illustrates differences between data available in professional databases such as ...
Introduction about Web of Science and Scopus: searching both databases and how to obtain the main re...
A report conducted at Oregon State University Libraries in Spring 2017 on the features of the Web of...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research eva...
Researchers, to conduct any bibliometric analysis prefer to retrieve publications data mostly from E...
and citation database covering all areas of science thus becoming an invaluable tool in bibliometric...
The databases of Web of Science (WoS) have rapidly expanded their coverage of scientific journal dur...
Researchers use different resources to trace the research done in their field of interest and to fin...
This study uses citations to a group of 42 LIS faculty members to examine the differences between Sc...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, with bibliometrics...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
This study analyses the differences between what the academic communities of a country regard should...
The evaluation of research outputs in the form of journal articles is important to help with monitor...
This investigation illustrates differences between data available in professional databases such as ...
Introduction about Web of Science and Scopus: searching both databases and how to obtain the main re...
A report conducted at Oregon State University Libraries in Spring 2017 on the features of the Web of...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research eva...
Researchers, to conduct any bibliometric analysis prefer to retrieve publications data mostly from E...
and citation database covering all areas of science thus becoming an invaluable tool in bibliometric...
The databases of Web of Science (WoS) have rapidly expanded their coverage of scientific journal dur...
Researchers use different resources to trace the research done in their field of interest and to fin...
This study uses citations to a group of 42 LIS faculty members to examine the differences between Sc...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, with bibliometrics...