Le discours politique des islamistes marocains au pouvoir : le discours populiste

At the end of this chapter entitled "Conflictual affective discourse", the study focused on a number of legitimising discursive strategies mobilised by Benkirane. In fact, the discourses that we have tried to analyse are part of a context marked by a social tension unseen in the history of Morocco (after the Arab Spring). These social realities, marked by a tension, or even a calculation of ideological repositioning between Islamists, communists, socialists, technocrats, etc., are, from the sociolinguistic interactional point of view, manifest in the discourse where the speaker seeks to impose his identity. This observation has led us to set up a typology that better defines this conflictual context, hence the interest in the grid developed by Windisch, whose author insists considerably on the internal functioning of a conflictual discourse produced in a situation of tension. All the studies aimed at analysing legitimating discourse agree on two fundamental points: on the one hand, discourse is perceived as a linguistic production anchored in symbolic relations of force, negotiation, manipulation and persuasion between individuals; on the other hand, in order for each of them to achieve their objectives, the social actor is confronted with certain constraints in order to convey the meaning he or she aims for. In addressing the issue of dramatization in the so-called populist discourse, Patrick Charaudeau insists considerably on the affective dimension in the interaction with the mass.