In this paper, I explore and evaluate Frege’s data. Different from I call the traditional conception – especially those proposals provided by Howard Wettstein, Nathan Salmon and John Perry in the 80’s, which I take as representative philosophers from the traditional conception –, I support that Frege’s puzzle cannot be based on psychological data. I hold that only epistemic data can cause Frege’s puzzle and explain what are these epistemic data and the difference between these data and the psychological one, considering and replying to a possible objection
According to psychologism, laws of logic and mathematics are not anything except generalized account...
My main aim is to identify and discuss parallels between the epistemologies of Gottlob Frege and Jea...
this paper is that the phenomenon is more general: there is reason to distinguish sense from psychol...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n3p427In this paper I focus my attention on the proposal ...
In “Can Frege Pose Frege’s Puzzle?”, Stavroula Glezakos argues that Frege’s puzzle about the cogniti...
In this paper I take issue with Glezakos’s (2009) account of why Frege’s puzzle is un-puzzling. On h...
In this paper I first review the main elements of the so-called Frege’s Puzzle, and argue that there...
This paper is about belief ascriptions and problems that arise for a Fregean theory
Many philosophers have argued or taken for granted that Frege's puzzle has little or nothing to do w...
So-called 'Frege cases' pose a challenge for anyone who would hope to treat the contents of beliefs ...
What are the absolutely essential features of the intentionality of our beliefs and desires? Some ph...
To resolve Frege’s puzzle we must understand how cognitive agents grasp or conceive of individuals s...
We examine how Frege’s contrast between identity judgments of the forms “a=a” vs. “a=b” would fare i...
I take issue with Glezakos’s explanation of why Frege’s puzzle is un-puzzling. On her view, Frege’s ...
The first explicit use of Frege's work appeared in Piaget's writings in 1949, when he was over 50 ye...
According to psychologism, laws of logic and mathematics are not anything except generalized account...
My main aim is to identify and discuss parallels between the epistemologies of Gottlob Frege and Jea...
this paper is that the phenomenon is more general: there is reason to distinguish sense from psychol...
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n3p427In this paper I focus my attention on the proposal ...
In “Can Frege Pose Frege’s Puzzle?”, Stavroula Glezakos argues that Frege’s puzzle about the cogniti...
In this paper I take issue with Glezakos’s (2009) account of why Frege’s puzzle is un-puzzling. On h...
In this paper I first review the main elements of the so-called Frege’s Puzzle, and argue that there...
This paper is about belief ascriptions and problems that arise for a Fregean theory
Many philosophers have argued or taken for granted that Frege's puzzle has little or nothing to do w...
So-called 'Frege cases' pose a challenge for anyone who would hope to treat the contents of beliefs ...
What are the absolutely essential features of the intentionality of our beliefs and desires? Some ph...
To resolve Frege’s puzzle we must understand how cognitive agents grasp or conceive of individuals s...
We examine how Frege’s contrast between identity judgments of the forms “a=a” vs. “a=b” would fare i...
I take issue with Glezakos’s explanation of why Frege’s puzzle is un-puzzling. On her view, Frege’s ...
The first explicit use of Frege's work appeared in Piaget's writings in 1949, when he was over 50 ye...
According to psychologism, laws of logic and mathematics are not anything except generalized account...
My main aim is to identify and discuss parallels between the epistemologies of Gottlob Frege and Jea...
this paper is that the phenomenon is more general: there is reason to distinguish sense from psychol...