Application of Scientific Evidence as to the Main Argument in Determining the Causality of Doctors' Actions

The emergence of facts of death in the case of a doctor’s negligence must obtain legal reasoning based on critical thinking. By thinking critically, the medico-legal opinion given is guaranteed more logical, both clinical cases in the medical field and juridical cases in the field of law, it is necessary to develop arguments that are full of causal related requires the explanation of forensic medicine experts as the main argument(central argument). This concerns the technical issue of reliable empirical clarification of facts.Medicolegal case resolution requires the formation of a solid argument by not mixing the two disciplines into the analysis of the case.Determining the size and requirements of whether the doctor's actions have committed a professional error or not, to what extent the doctor's actions can be legally protected, it is necessary to trace the causality chain to find a direct cause argumentatively based on scientific evidence in the enforcement of the causality of doctors' actions