Nowadays the opinion is widely held that science and technology are very closely linked to each other, and that the value of the first depends on the implications it may have for the second. This opinion represents a serious mistake, which ignores the genuine nature of science, both historically and epistemologically, a mistake that may lead to an impoverishment of the scientific spirit and of human culture in general. In this essay, I intend to analyze the sources of the mistake in question and contrast it with an appropriate perspective to understand what is, and what should continue to be, the true scientific spirit
In the article two questions are considered: does science study values, and is science valuable, or ...
The aim of this paper is to show that science, understood as pure research, ought not to be affected...
After a sketch of the optimism and high aspirations of History and Philosophy of Science when I firs...
This essay critically examines a questionable presupposition of contemporary science—that science is...
The controversy over the old ideal of “value-free science” has cooled significantly over the past de...
The controversy over the old ideal of “value-free science ” has cooled significantly over the past d...
The aim of this paper is to show that science, understood as pure research, ought not to be affected...
With the continual growth of scientific knowledge and ever-increasing arguments for science as the e...
Science and technology are frequently confused. This essay points out the bases for this confusion a...
Science, a powerful and influential enterprise, affecting even our thinking, cannot be ignored. Its ...
Science is not possible in the absence of epistemic values (truth, simplicity), but what are the mor...
Over history science has, in a more and more agnostic world, come to replace religion as the most im...
Science is not possible in the absence of epistemic values (truth, simplicity), but what are the mor...
In this essay the author defends the traditional view of science: science as an activity of approach...
In spite of the relevance of a scientific representation of the world for naturalism, it is surprisi...
In the article two questions are considered: does science study values, and is science valuable, or ...
The aim of this paper is to show that science, understood as pure research, ought not to be affected...
After a sketch of the optimism and high aspirations of History and Philosophy of Science when I firs...
This essay critically examines a questionable presupposition of contemporary science—that science is...
The controversy over the old ideal of “value-free science” has cooled significantly over the past de...
The controversy over the old ideal of “value-free science ” has cooled significantly over the past d...
The aim of this paper is to show that science, understood as pure research, ought not to be affected...
With the continual growth of scientific knowledge and ever-increasing arguments for science as the e...
Science and technology are frequently confused. This essay points out the bases for this confusion a...
Science, a powerful and influential enterprise, affecting even our thinking, cannot be ignored. Its ...
Science is not possible in the absence of epistemic values (truth, simplicity), but what are the mor...
Over history science has, in a more and more agnostic world, come to replace religion as the most im...
Science is not possible in the absence of epistemic values (truth, simplicity), but what are the mor...
In this essay the author defends the traditional view of science: science as an activity of approach...
In spite of the relevance of a scientific representation of the world for naturalism, it is surprisi...
In the article two questions are considered: does science study values, and is science valuable, or ...
The aim of this paper is to show that science, understood as pure research, ought not to be affected...
After a sketch of the optimism and high aspirations of History and Philosophy of Science when I firs...