Data from: Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom

Since Darwin's conception of sexual selection theory, scientists have struggled to identify the evolutionary forces underlying the pervasive differences between male and female behavior, morphology, and physiology. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm predicts that anisogamy imposes stronger sexual selection on males, which, in turn, drives the evolution of conventional sex roles in terms of female-biased parental care and male-biased sexual dimorphism. Although this paradigm forms the cornerstone of modern sexual selection theory, it still remains untested across the animal tree of life. This lack of evidence has promoted the rise of alternative hypotheses arguing that sex differences are entirely driven by environmental factors or chance. We demonstrate that, across the animal kingdom, sexual selection, as captured by standard Bateman metrics, is indeed stronger in males than in females and that it is evolutionarily tied to sex biases in parental care and sexual dimorphism. Our findings provide the first comprehensive evidence that Darwin's concept of conventional sex roles is accurate and refute recent criticism of sexual selection theory.Main Data FileFile contains all data used for the reported meta-analyses including effect sizes (dI_lnCVR, dIs_lnCVR, dbeta_g), their corresponding variances (dI_lnCVR_VAR, dIs_lnCVR_VAR, dbeta_g_VAR), as well as categories for parental care and sexual dimorphism.Janicke_et_al_2006_Data.xlsxPhylogeny FileFile contains the phylogeny in NEWICK format used to run the phylogenetically independent meta-analyses.Janicke_et_al_2006_Phylogeny.tx