A fundamental subject delivered at the tertiary level could have a cohort of several hundreds of students distributed into multiple campuses. The running of such a unit typically calls for a teaching team of which a major task is to fairly mark all students’ various assessment items. It is well observed that a given assessment is likely to receive different marks if it is given to different markers, often regardless of how detailed the marking criteria are, especially when the content is of subjective or opinion based nature. In this work, we propose an effective strategy to improve the fairness on the students’ overall marks by accepting that markers may have inherent marking leniency of different magnitude and by dynamically reselecting m...
This study is an analysis of two different marking schemes for an 'authentic' Group Project worth 50...
The aim of this paper is to stimulate further discussion on divergent institutional and academic nee...
Can naïve markers evaluate their peers? What factors influence student assessors? Is it fair to ‘pas...
A fundamental subject delivered at the tertiary level could have a cohort of several hundreds of stu...
“Blind marking” is said to reduce the chance of bias arising in the assessment of written assignment...
Unreliability in marking is well documented, yet we lack studies that have investigated assessors’ d...
Covid-19 has placed unprecedented pressure on higher education institutions, not least of which is t...
Schools and departments in Australian universities assess students in their units through a number o...
Marker bias has been a serious factor contributing to discrepancy in assessments. In this study we a...
Developing evaluative judgement is challenging in a system that focuses student attention on marks a...
Reliability and validity are ever-present themes in the evaluation of assessment. Previous research ...
Assessment consistency is not easy to maintain across many assessors for a unit of a large student p...
A scheme has been implemented and used over a two year period to address the problem of several refe...
The ability to assess learning outcomes is vital to effective teaching. Without understanding what s...
have an effect on student marking consistency? This item was submitted to Loughborough University&ap...
This study is an analysis of two different marking schemes for an 'authentic' Group Project worth 50...
The aim of this paper is to stimulate further discussion on divergent institutional and academic nee...
Can naïve markers evaluate their peers? What factors influence student assessors? Is it fair to ‘pas...
A fundamental subject delivered at the tertiary level could have a cohort of several hundreds of stu...
“Blind marking” is said to reduce the chance of bias arising in the assessment of written assignment...
Unreliability in marking is well documented, yet we lack studies that have investigated assessors’ d...
Covid-19 has placed unprecedented pressure on higher education institutions, not least of which is t...
Schools and departments in Australian universities assess students in their units through a number o...
Marker bias has been a serious factor contributing to discrepancy in assessments. In this study we a...
Developing evaluative judgement is challenging in a system that focuses student attention on marks a...
Reliability and validity are ever-present themes in the evaluation of assessment. Previous research ...
Assessment consistency is not easy to maintain across many assessors for a unit of a large student p...
A scheme has been implemented and used over a two year period to address the problem of several refe...
The ability to assess learning outcomes is vital to effective teaching. Without understanding what s...
have an effect on student marking consistency? This item was submitted to Loughborough University&ap...
This study is an analysis of two different marking schemes for an 'authentic' Group Project worth 50...
The aim of this paper is to stimulate further discussion on divergent institutional and academic nee...
Can naïve markers evaluate their peers? What factors influence student assessors? Is it fair to ‘pas...