THE MUTUAL COMPARİSON OF THE LANGUAGES AT THE LEVEL OF THE PHİLOLOGİCAL ANALYSİS

Despite being fluent in Arabic and Persian, the brilliant Uzbek poet and thinker Alishir Navai criticized poets who wrote in those languages in accordance with the prevailing norm at the time and vehemently objected to Turkish languages being dominated by other languages. Navai proved that the Turkish language is a language of metaphors, epithets, rhymes, rich verbs and its superiority over the mentioned languages with his creativity. The "Muhakumat-ul Lughateyn" piece by Alishir Navai demonstrated that the Turkish language, like other languages, has limitless creative potential for this reason. He urges poets and writers to use the Turkish language's riches, which are superior to eighteen thousand worlds, highnesses, virtues, and subtleties, instead of producing literary and creative works in Persian. In the language comparison, A. Navai gave the Turkish language the upper hand by demonstrating that all Persian concepts are likewise available in Turkish. However, compared to Turkish, the Persian language does not have as many exquisite, profoundly important notions or delicate verb meanings. A self-assured politician elevated the Turkish language to the same level as the eminent tongues of his era. He did this task in a realistic manner and set an example for everyone. In addition to various other Turkish works, Navai is the author of five divans, five poems (Khamsa), two tazkiras, three philological, six religious-moral, three historical, and other works. Alishir Navai writes in "Muhakimat-ul Lughateyn" that Turks are more understanding and clear-sighted than Persians (Persians living in the city), and their nature is purer. He talks about the Turkish people, the intellectual and scientific thinking of the Turkish language, which was written due to the luck of God. Later, he talks about the power of the Persian word, the gentle words that touch the soul and the elegant sayings that keep the soul alive. However, in comparison of these two languages, he gives examples of 100 verbs to prove the superiority and merits of the Turkish language. He emphasizes that each of these verbs has two, three, four, sometimes five meanings